The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Between Orthodox Judaism and Neology: The Origins of the Status Quo Movement
Abstract
Contemporary Jewish historiography has tended to deal disproportionately with Jews at the ends of the various spectra of Jewish identity—that is, the most assimilated and the most insular, the most and least religiously traditional, and the most and least nationalistic. Examining the actions and beliefs of these clusters of Jews, to be sure, is a vital component in understanding the experience of European Jewry, not least of all because they played a decisive role in the transformation of European Jewry. No less important, however, are the experiences of the majority of European Jews, who articulated no ideology to justify their beliefs and actions, who may or may not have joined one or more movements for any number of pragmatic or ideological reasons, and who steered clear of extreme responses to the challenges of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, preferring instead to pick and choose between a growing array of possibilities rather than to champion one and impugn the rest.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Infighting between Hasidic groups, between Hasidim and non-Hasidic traditionalists, and between traditionalist Orthodox and more freethinking Jews associated with the 'Status Quo' community was endemic in the Hungarian Unterland in the last half of the nineteenth century.
“Indeed, infighting between Hasidic groups, between Hasidim and non-Hasidic traditionalists, and between traditionalist Orthodox and more freethinking Jews associated with the ' Status Quo ' community, was endemic in the Hungarian Unterland in the last half of the nineteenth century”
From “Commanded War”: Three Chapters in the “Military” History of Satmar Hasidism (2013) · cites this paper as Lupovitch 2003: 123ff
Citations
Cites
Response to Modernity: A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism.
Vital, D., & Meyer, M. A. (1990) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2162962 · Cited by 168
The Uses of tradition : Jewish continuity in the modern era
Wertheimer, J. (1992) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 153
A house divided: orthodoxy and schism in nineteenth-century Central European Jewry
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3492 · Cited by 111
Cohen, M. M., Kohut, A., & Elzas, B. A. (1920) · Cited by 13
Ujvári, P. (1929) · Cited by 10
RABBI ESRIEL HILDESHEIMER AND THE QUEST FOR RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY: THE EARLIEST YEARS
Ellenson, D. (1981) · Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience · doi:10.1093/mj/1.3.279 · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enzyklopädie jüdischer Geschichte und Kultur
Diner, D. (2011) · Enzyklopädie jüdischer Geschichte und Kultur · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-01207-4_1 · Cited by 32
Maramaros, Hungary--The Cradle of Extreme Orthodoxy
Keren-Kratz, M. (2015) · Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience · doi:10.1093/mj/kjv008 · Cited by 18
“Some refused because they believed the regulations were too strict, while others considered them too lenient.(41) This same principle was later adopted by Extreme Orthodox leaders to mark those who joined the pan-European Orthodox organization Agudath Israel as being in the ‘‘wrong’’ camp.”
Background“Commanded War”: Three Chapters in the “Military” History of Satmar Hasidism
Myers, D. N. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfs101 · Cited by 17
“…Hasidic groups, between Hasidim and non-Hasidic traditionalists, and between traditionalist Orthodox and more freethinking Jews associated with the “Status Quo” community, was endemic in the Hungarian Unterland in the last half of the nineteenth century (Silber 1994: 124ff; Lupovitch 2003: 123ff ).”
BackgroundMichael Polanyi and Jewish Identity
Knepper, P. E. (2005) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393105277986 · Cited by 6
The Politics of a Religious Enclave: Orthodox Jews in Interwar Transylvania, Romania
Keren-Kratz, M. (2017) · Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience · doi:10.1093/mj/kjx026 · Cited by 3
“This organization, titled The Central Bureau of the Autonomous Orthodox Communities in Hungary, functioned up until the Holocaust.7 A group of communities that chose not to join either the Neolog or the newly established Orthodox organization, was allowed to adhere to the pre-congress Hungarian regulations and was cal…”
BackgroundEurope in a Changing World: Opportunities and ChallengesPreprint
Chirodea, F., Ţoca, C.-V., Șoproni, L., Stoica, A., & Czimre, K. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4007145 · Cited by 2
Enzyklopädie jüdischer Geschichte und Kultur
Diner, D. (2012) · Enzyklopädie jüdischer Geschichte und Kultur · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-01218-0_1 · Cited by 1
Gondos, A. (2019) · Contemporary Review of the Middle East · doi:10.1177/2347798919872831
“On the schism within Hungarian Jewry, see (Lupovitch, 2003; Katz, 1989; Silber, 1985).”
BackgroundKeeping up the separatist tradition: Hungarian Orthodoxy in interwar Austria, Yugoslavia, and Italy
Keren-Kratz, M. (2020) · Journal of Modern Jewish Studies · doi:10.1080/14725886.2020.1744326
Gucsa, M. (2023) · Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem · doi:10.15476/elte.2023.247
Metadata
- Authors
- Lupovitch, H.
- Corresponding author
- Lupovitch, Howard
- Venue
- Jewish Social Studies
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-153
- ISSN
- 0021-6704 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-2028
- OpenAlex
- W2084877392
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Jewish Social Studies (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Jewish Identity and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Keywords
- Orthodox Judaism, neology, Jewish identity, European Jewry, Jewish religious movements, religious traditionalism, Jewish assimilation, Zionism, nineteenth-century Judaism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
