The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar
Abstract
Most linguists who have investigated linguistic categories from a universal viewpoint have accepted the existence of two basic parts of speech, noun and verb. Other categories are found to be only inconsistently represented; thus adjective is manifested in many languages as a class of stative verb. Furthermore, individual languages often have intermediate categories such as gerund, which cannot be unambiguously assigned to a single category. We suggest here that the basic categories N and V are to be viewed as universal lexicalizations of the prototypical discourse functions of ‘discourse-manipulable participant’ and ‘reported event’, respectively. We find that the grammars of languages tend to label the categories N and V with morpho-syntactic markers which are iconically characteristic of these categories to the degree that a given instance of N or V approaches its prototypical function. In other words, the closer a form is to signaling this prime function, the more the language tends to recognize its function through morphemes typical of the category—e.g. deictic markers for N, tense markers for V. We conclude by suggesting that categoriality itself is another fundamental property of grammars which may be directly derived from discourse function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1980.0017 · Cited by 3,239
Self-citationMandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar
Wadley, S., Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1987) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/603476 · Cited by 2,905
Self-citationRosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032633275 · Cited by 2,829
Švarný, O., Chao, Y. R., & Svarny, O. (1972) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/599674 · Cited by 2,751
Rosch, E. H. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 · Cited by 2,401
Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics
Lyons, J. (1968) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165570 · Cited by 2,085
Language Acquisition: The State of the Art
Wanner, E., & Gleitman, L. R. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,022
Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A., & Moravcsik, E. A. (1978) · Cited by 1,824
On Understanding Grammar: Revised edition
Givón, T. (2018) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.213 · Cited by 1,753
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165525 · Cited by 2,135
Self-citationSilverstein, M. (2005) · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.6 · Cited by 438
Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure
Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J. (2001) · Typological Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/tsl.45.01byb · Cited by 373
Self-citationStudying Complex Discursive Systems..: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication
Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., Mcphee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00802.x · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- Linguistic Society of America
- Published
- 1984-12-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 703-752
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066358185
- Cited by
- 893
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 56.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/lan.1984.0020
- The paper
- Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1984). The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar. Language. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.