The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phonological Variation in Child-Directed Speech
Abstract
Segmental features of child-directed speech (CDS) were studied in a corpus drawn from thirty-nine mothers living in Tyneside, England. Focus was on the phonetic variants used for (t) in word-medial and word-final prevocalic contexts since it is known that these variants display clear sociolinguistic patterning in the adult community. Variant usage in CDS was found to differ markedly from that in interadult speech. Effects were also found with respect to the age and gender of the children being addressed. Speech to girls generally contained more standard variants than speech to boys, which, by contrast, contained higher rates of vernacular variants. The differentiation by gender was most apparent for the youngest children. The findings are assessed in comparison to other studies of CDS. It has previously been claimed that modifications made in the CDS register help children to learn linguistic structures and also to learn that speech is a social activity. Our findings suggest that CDS may play an additional role, providing boys and girls as young as 2;0 with differential opportunities to learn the social-indexical values of sociolinguistic variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parents' differential socialization of boys and girls: a meta-analysis
Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.267 · Cited by 1,210
Cited by
Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech
Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003 · Cited by 300
Smith, J., Durham, M., & Fortune, L. (2007) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394507070044 · Cited by 290
Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions
MOORE, E., & PODESVA, R. (2009) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404509990224 · Cited by 288
Exploring social-indexical knowledge: A long past but a short history
Foulkes, P. (2010) · Laboratory Phonology · doi:10.1515/labphon.2010.003 · Cited by 43
Self-citationMunson, B., Lackas, N., & Koeppe, K. (2022) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00465 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Foulkes, P., Docherty, G., & Watt, D.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-206
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-0665
- OpenAlex
- W2074916712
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phonological Variation in Child-Directed Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/lan.2005.0018
- The paper
- Foulkes, P., Docherty, G., & Watt, D. (2005). Phonological Variation in Child-Directed Speech. Language. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.