Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família
Abstract
The central hypothesis derived in this article is that the ability of Brazil's central government to bypass governors determined the success of delivering public goods federation-wide in the area of noncontributory social protection policy. The Workers' Party's (Partido dos Trabalhadores) first-term administration from 2003 to 2006 successfully reformed, expanded, and implemented four previously existing cash-transfer programs designed to alleviate poverty. The central administration's flagship program Bolsa Família was implemented in all of Brazil's municipalities, delivering benefits to more than 11 million households. A nonmajoritarian political system, the constitutional autonomy of municipalities, and the gradual hardening of post-1995 subnational budget constraints facilitated the ability of the central government to live up to the aspirations and expectations of the Brazilian public by combating hunger, poverty, and misery through this program. This article shows these institutional factors to have provided incentives for successful central-local collaboration in this social policy area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social policies and cash transfer programs have enabled several millions of Brazilians to leave poverty behind.
“while the social policies and cash transfer programs have enabled several millions of Brazilians to leave poverty behind (Barrientos, 2013 andFenwick, 2009).”
From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Fenwick, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tritsch, I., & Arvor, D. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fenwick, T. B.
- Corresponding author
- Tracy Beck Fenwick
- ORCID
- Tracy Beck Fenwick
- Venue
- Latin American Research Review
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-131
- ISSN
- 0023-8791 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4278
- OpenAlex
- W1969139483
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 29.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Latin American Research Review (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Political Issues
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- Bolsa Família, cash transfers, central-local government relations, Workers' Party, poverty reduction, federalism, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review