Cited by 190Social and Political IssuesLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationPolitics and Society in Latin America

Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família

Tracy Beck Fenwick·2009·Latin American Research Review

Abstract

The central hypothesis derived in this article is that the ability of Brazil's central government to bypass governors determined the success of delivering public goods federation-wide in the area of noncontributory social protection policy. The Workers' Party's (Partido dos Trabalhadores) first-term administration from 2003 to 2006 successfully reformed, expanded, and implemented four previously existing cash-transfer programs designed to alleviate poverty. The central administration's flagship program Bolsa Família was implemented in all of Brazil's municipalities, delivering benefits to more than 11 million households. A nonmajoritarian political system, the constitutional autonomy of municipalities, and the gradual hardening of post-1995 subnational budget constraints facilitated the ability of the central government to live up to the aspirations and expectations of the Brazilian public by combating hunger, poverty, and misery through this program. This article shows these institutional factors to have provided incentives for successful central-local collaboration in this social policy area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/lar.0.0073

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Fenwick, T. B.
Corresponding author
Tracy Beck Fenwick
Venue
Latin American Research Review
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2009
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
102-131
ISSN
  • 0023-8791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4278
OpenAlex
W1969139483
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
29.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Latin American Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Political Issues
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
Keywords
Bolsa Família, cash transfers, central-local government relations, Workers' Party, poverty reduction, federalism, Brazil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review