A Holistic Approach for Inclusive Librarianship: Decentering Whiteness in Our Profession
Open accessAbstract
This paper traces the published literature on whiteness in libraries, identifying major themes in that literature, and then highlights the importance of decentering whiteness for moving the information professions forward.Engaging a dialogic ethnographic methodology, this paper was borne of conversations between librarians of color who worked in the same predominantly white library.The salient themes from those dialogues were the many ways that adherence to whiteness in libraries has had deleterious affective and career implications for librarians of color.The authors argue that to decenter whiteness in libraries and other information centers, it is crucial to center the experiences and well-being of librarians of color; diversify the ranks of librarians through bold initiatives, significantly increasing the numbers of librarians of color; and make large-scale incisive structural change at organizational levels.The paper concludes with an invitation for all information professionals to participate in inclusiveness initiatives by moving from microaggressions to microaffections.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The field of CIL in North America is predominantly white and must reckon with its past and present complicity in upholding systems of racialised oppression.
“This failing is especially concerning in a field that in North America is predominantly white and must reckon with its past and present complicity in upholding systems of racialised oppression (Espinal et al., 2018).”
From Two decades of critical information literacy: a review and analysis of the literature (2025) · cites this paper as Espinal et al., 2018
Cites
In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library
Brook, F., Ellenwood, D., & Lazzaro, A. E. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0048 · Cited by 133 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Chris Bourg (2014) used US Census figures to demonstrate that librarianship is overwhelmingly white, asserting that the lack of diversity in a profession that claims it as a core value “is embarrassing”: the population of white librarians is 88 percent, while the US population is only 63 percent white.”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two decades of critical information literacy: a review and analysis of the literature
Tewell, E. (2025) · Information Research an international electronic journal · doi:10.47989/ir30colis52267 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Farrier, V. (2024) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2024.2328158
- Authors
- Espinal, I., Sutherland, T., & Roh, C.
- Venue
- Library Trends
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-162
- ISSN
- 0024-2594 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-0682
- OpenAlex
- W2898461528
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 60.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Library trends (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Science and Libraries
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- whiteness, decentering whiteness, diversity in librarianship, microaggressions, information professions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review