Cited by 1Biblical Studies and InterpretationKarl Barth and Christian TheologyClassical Studies and Philology

Circular Rhetoric and Paradox in 1 John 3:9

Min, Richard K.·2017·Neotestamentica

Abstract

Circular rhetoric has been a controversial area of research in biblical scholarship for the latter half of the 20th century. Recently there has been a renewed interest in this area of research, due in part to a new approach by the current author, with some exciting new results in biblical exegesis and hermeneutics. Some noteworthy examples of circular rhetoric in the Bible include the liar paradox in Titus 1:12, the divine "I am" sayings in Exodus 3:14, the circular indwelling relationships in John 14:10-11, and the two proof-methods in John 8:12-20. Another noteworthy example is the two-stage coming of the Kingdom of God as a temporal-modal paradox of "already" and "not yet" in tension (Luke 17:20-30) in the framework of Salvation History (Heilsgeschichte). This article extends the approach to the circular rhetoric and paradoxical logic of the argument about the impeccability of God's children in 1 John 3:9. According to this Johannine text, everyone "born of God" does not sin for God's seed dwells in him, and he is unable to sin for he is "one born of God." This is clearly an example of circular rhetoric, to be further examined for the associated paradox.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/neo.2017.0004

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Min, R. K.
Corresponding author
Min, Richard K.
Venue
Neotestamentica
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2017
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
83-93
ISSN
  • 0254-8356 (ISSN-L)
  • 2518-4628
OpenAlex
W2784426960
Cited by
1
References
16
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neotestamentica (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
paradox, Johannine literature, biblical rhetoric, Johannine epistles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review