The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experience and Signs: Towards a Pragmatist Literary Criticism
Abstract
COULD THERE BE A PRAGMATIST LITERARY CRITICISM? Richard Rorty doesn't seem to think so.1 The thinkers lumped under classical made only passing references to literature, and only William James's magpie delight in gathering quotations from Stevenson, Whitman, Tolstoy, and others even approaches an analysis of texts. Why then turn to pragmatism for a method of reading and interpretation? For calisthenics: Pragmatism unstiffens all our theories, limbers them up and sets each one at work.2 This essay seeks to put theories of meaning and representation in literary criticism on the stretching bar by reorienting them towards pragmatist conceptions of process, action, and experience. In particular, it asks What does a text do? rather than What does a text mean? and then traces the difference that this difference makes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in the application of speech act linguistics to the study of documents, there is a disturbing tendency either to misuse speech act theory or to provide an empty gesture to speech acts in particular, as Gorman has discussed in terms of literary criticism”
From Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s (2014) · cites this paper as Gaskill 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s
Davidson, R. M. (2014) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x13000943 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaskill, N. M.
- Corresponding author
- Gaskill, Nicholas M.
- ORCID
- Gaskill, Nicholas M.
- Venue
- New Literary History
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-183
- ISSN
- 0028-6087 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-661X
- OpenAlex
- W2033338357
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Literary History (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › American and British Literature Analysis
- Keywords
- Richard Rorty, pragmatism, meaning, representation, experience, signs, William James, interpretation theory, process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
