The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 6 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Neoanalysis and Oral Tradition in Homeric Studies
Open accessAbstract
By oral tradition I understand the transmission from one generation to another of verbal messages of any kind carried out without recourse to writing, whether because this medium is unavailable or by deliberate choice. The messages can be transmitted verbatim or re-created anew at the time of delivery.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
2 Not checked yet · 1 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the approach in question leads to the conclusion that, rather than being just two traditional poems among many, the Iliad and the Odyssey possessed a special status within the tradition to which they belonged.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption not shown here.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“that more often than not Homer worked by consciously reshaping the tradition he inherited and adapting it to his own agenda”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Slatkin 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ballabriga 1998
- Not matchedcites Danek 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“that in everything concerning the general picture of the Trojan War the Homeric poems presuppose the tradition represented in the poems of the Cycle rather than vice versa”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Slatkin 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ballabriga 1998
- Not matchedcites Danek 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
Create a free account to see these assumptions.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Tel Aviv University
“cf.my reviews ofMalkin 1998and Burgess 2001 (Finkelberg 2002a and 2002b).”
§ References
“Finkelberg 2002b . Review of Burgess 1998 in Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 2002.09.04.”
Citations
Cites
The returns of Odysseus: colonization and ethnicity
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5824 · Cited by 513 · cited 1×
“Tel Aviv University 1 See especially Slatkin 1991, Ballabriga 1998, Danek 1998, Malkin 1998, and Burgess 2001; cf. my reviews of Malkin 1998 and Burgess 2001 (Finkelberg 2002a and 2002b).”
BackgroundThe tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the epic cycle
Burgess, J. S. (2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0741 · Cited by 376 · cited 1×
“Tel Aviv University 1 See especially Slatkin 1991, Ballabriga 1998, Danek 1998, Malkin 1998, and Burgess 2001; cf. my reviews of Malkin 1998 and Burgess 2001 (Finkelberg 2002a and 2002b).”
BackgroundThe Power of Thetis: Allusion and Interpretation in the Iliad
Slatkin, L. M. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 226
Epos und Zitat: Studien zu den Quellen der Odyssee
Clay, J. S., & Danek, G. (2001) · The Classical World · doi:10.2307/4352607 · Cited by 151
Hartmann, A. (2003) · Cited by 50
The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle
Griffiths, F. T. (2003) · The Classical Review · Cited by 14
The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle
Edwards, M. W., & Burgess, J. S. (2004) · Phoenix · doi:10.2307/4135202 · Cited by 13
(1998) · Presses Universitaires de France eBooks · Cited by 12
Irad Malkin, The Returns of Odysseus. Colonization and Ethnicity
Papadopoulou-Belmehdi, I. (2000) · Kernos · doi:10.4000/kernos.1326 · Cited by 8
Cited by
Neoanalysis, Orality, and Intertextuality: An Examination of Homeric Motif Transference
Burgess, J. S. (2006) · Oral Tradition · doi:10.1353/ort.2006.0014 · Cited by 178
Agnoēsis and the Death of Odysseus in the Odyssey and the Telegony
Arft, J. (2019) · Yearbook of Ancient Greek Epic Online · doi:10.1163/24688487-00301007 · Cited by 38
Ercolani, A., & Lulli, L. (2022) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110751963 · Cited by 1
A Cyclic Theme in the Odyssey: The Oresteia in Zeus’ Speech (1, 28–43)
Scafoglio, G. (2022) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110751963-006
. (Antiquity in the Modern Times. Homeric Question)Preprint
Grintser, N. P., & Shumilin, M. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2626513
Metadata
- Authors
- Finkelberg, M.
- Corresponding author
- Finkelberg, Margalit
- ORCID
- Finkelberg, Margalit
- Venue
- Oral Tradition
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-69
- ISSN
- 0883-5365 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-4308
- OpenAlex
- W1985769565
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Oral tradition (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Keywords
- neoanalysis, Homeric studies, oral transmission, verbal messages, Homeric epic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neoanalysis and Oral Tradition in Homeric Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/ort.2004.0014
- The paper
- Finkelberg, M. (2003). Neoanalysis and Oral Tradition in Homeric Studies. Oral Tradition. https://doi.org/10.1353/ort.2004.0014
