Cited by 70Ethics and bioethics in healthcareMedicine, History, and PhilosophyPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Doctoring as leadership: the power to heal

Schei, Edvin·2006·Perspectives in biology and medicine

Abstract

Physician power has been attacked, and tabooed, in legitimate efforts to strengthen patients' rights. Yet the structural and symbolic power wielded by doctors is what makes good and right healing actions possible. Avoiding the power issue contributes to a confusing state, where patient trust is faltering and physicians are uncertain about how to fulfill the doctor's role with the intellectual tools of mere science and technology. I argue that constitutive characteristics of health, illness, and the clinical encounter necessitate a prescriptive and responsible healing agent who is more than a technocrat, an information broker, or a seller. The article proposes clinical leadership as a concept offering practical and ethical direction to clinicians, education, research, and health policy. Leadership presupposes reflective awareness of physicians' structural and symbolic power, and is displayed as discerning, empowering improvisations in critical situations, based on empathy and willingness to learn from patients. The notion of clinical leadership highlights patient vulnerability, medicine's ethical core, and the importance of character development in medical education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/pbm.2006.0048

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schei, E.
Affiliations
University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Schei, Edvin
Venue
Perspectives in biology and medicine
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2006-06
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
393-406
ISSN
  • 0031-5982 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8795
OpenAlex
W2064256669
Cited by
70
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perspectives in biology and medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
clinical leadership, physician power, structural power, symbolic power, healing, patient trust, patient vulnerability, medical ethics, medical education, character development, empathy, physician-patient relationship, patient encounters
MeSH terms
Empathy, Humans, Leadership, Philosophy, Medical, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Power, Psychological, Symbolism, Paternalism, Patient Rights, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review