The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Putting Learning into Library Planning
Abstract
This essay notes the emergence of learning as a key factor in academic library planning. It argues for an improved, learning-oriented planning process by noting the dangers that arise from the priority usually given to fixing dysfunctional space and from the traps of mistaking the things of learning for learning itself and of thinking with the metaphors of learning rather than about what our metaphors actually mean. We can spring the trap by grounding planning in a sound concept of learning and by giving thoughtful attention to questions of ownership and presence in learning spaces. Five habits of highly effective planning are offered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Connector, Catalyst and Common Good: Defining the Academic Library of the 21st Century
Jaguszewski, J., & McGuire, L. A. (2018) · Library Leadership & Management · doi:10.5860/llm.v32i2.7227 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, S.
- Corresponding author
- Bennett, Scott
- Venue
- portal: Libraries and the Academy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-231
- ISSN
- 1530-7131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041553655
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- portal Libraries and the Academy (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- learning spaces, library space design, planning process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Putting Learning into Library Planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/pla.2015.0014
- The paper
- Bennett, S. (2015). Putting Learning into Library Planning. portal: Libraries and the Academy. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2015.0014