Cited by 30Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMental Health and PsychiatryStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychopathological symptoms and religious experience: a critique of Jackson and Fulford.

Marzanski, Marek, Bratton, Mark·2002·Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology

Abstract

The boundary between spiritual experience and mental disorder remains unclear and should invite collaboration between psychiatry and other disciplines, including theology. Jackson and Fulford (1997), using the tools of analytic philosophy, have proposed a model allowing principled differentiation between spiritual experience and psychotic symptoms based on the personal values of the subject, a cognitive problem-solving model. Spiritual experience is described as positively evaluated psychotic experience, which enables the subject to do more than he or she normally does. In the present paper, it is claimed that values and actions cannot alone always discriminate between religious experience and psychopathology. With reference to three case studies, drawn from the practice of one of us, it is argued that spirituality is not all about experience and that it cannot be understood without reference to the subject's personal history and spiritual tradition, however implicit or fragmented. This approach would allow an account of ordinary religious experience in those who have suffered ego disablement during mental illness. Drawing primarily on the Christian tradition, we argue that the use of theological criteria may allow levels of discrimination between spiritual experience and mental disorder not allowed for by philosophical psychopathology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/ppp.2003.0062

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marzanski, M., & Bratton, M.
Venue
Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2002-12
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
359-371
ISSN
  • 1071-6076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3303
OpenAlex
W2026730650
Cited by
30
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
religious experience, spiritual experience, psychopathology, psychotic symptoms, personal values, spirituality, Christian tradition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review