The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychopathological symptoms and religious experience: a critique of Jackson and Fulford.
Abstract
The boundary between spiritual experience and mental disorder remains unclear and should invite collaboration between psychiatry and other disciplines, including theology. Jackson and Fulford (1997), using the tools of analytic philosophy, have proposed a model allowing principled differentiation between spiritual experience and psychotic symptoms based on the personal values of the subject, a cognitive problem-solving model. Spiritual experience is described as positively evaluated psychotic experience, which enables the subject to do more than he or she normally does. In the present paper, it is claimed that values and actions cannot alone always discriminate between religious experience and psychopathology. With reference to three case studies, drawn from the practice of one of us, it is argued that spirituality is not all about experience and that it cannot be understood without reference to the subject's personal history and spiritual tradition, however implicit or fragmented. This approach would allow an account of ordinary religious experience in those who have suffered ego disablement during mental illness. Drawing primarily on the Christian tradition, we argue that the use of theological criteria may allow levels of discrimination between spiritual experience and mental disorder not allowed for by philosophical psychopathology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, while these criteria remain useful, they cannot be applied in all cases as self-evident rules for determining the nature of an experience (Marzanski and Bratton, 2002; Rashed, 2010).”
From Progress or Pathology? Differential Diagnosis and Intervention Criteria for Meditation-Related Challenges: Perspectives From Buddhist Meditation Teachers and Practitioners (2020) · cites this paper as Marzanski and Bratton, 2002
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,821
Book Review: Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
Priest, R. G. (1975) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591577506800751 · Cited by 2,268
Handbook of Religion and Mental Health
(1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417645-4.x5064-0 · Cited by 637
Moral Theory and Medical Practice.
Spitzer, M., & Fulford, K. W. M. (1993) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2215948 · Cited by 350
The darkness of God: negativity in Christian mysticism
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3268 · Cited by 346
Spiritual Experience and Psychopathology
Fulford, K. W. M., & Jackson, M. C. (1997) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.1997.0002 · Cited by 266
Phillips, S., Éliade, M., Trask, W. R., Hiltebeitel, A., & Apostolos‐Cappadona, D. (1986) · Philosophy East and West · doi:10.2307/1398456 · Cited by 224
The Mystical Element of Religion, as Studied in Saint Catherine of Genoa and Her Friends
Hügel, F. (2007) · Cited by 114
Easter In Ordinary: Reflections on Human Experience and the Knowledge of God
Lash, N. A. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 94
A Systematic Review of Research on Religion in Four Major Psychiatric Journals: 1991-1995
Weaver, A. J., Samford, J. A., Larson, D. B., Lucas, L. A., Koenig, H. G., & Patrick, V. (1998) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199803000-00008 · Cited by 59
Jewish Gnosticism, Merkabah Mysticism, and Talmudic Tradition
Smith, M., & Scholem, G. G. (1961) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3264218 · Cited by 57
Dictionary of Christian Spirituality
Wakefield, G. S. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 52
Weil, S. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203715154 · Cited by 44
Commentary on "Spiritual Experience and Psychopathology"
Littlewood, R. (1997) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.1997.0004 · Cited by 28
Mitchell, B. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24
Peers, E. A. (1964) · Doubleday eBooks · Cited by 17
Warner, M. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511563812 · Cited by 10
Commentary on "Spiritual Experience and Psychopathology"
Sims, A. C. P. (1997) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.1997.0009 · Cited by 8
Commentary on "Spiritual Experience and Psychopathology"
Lukoff, D. G., Lu, F. G., & Turner, R. P. (1997) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.1997.0012 · Cited by 7
Commentary on "Spiritual Experience and Psychopathology"
Storr, A. (1997) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.1997.0010 · Cited by 6
SUTHERLAND, S. R. (1992) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246100002162 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Lindahl, J. R., Cooper, D. J., Fisher, N. E., Kirmayer, L. J., & Britton, W. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01905 · Cited by 67
“Thus, while these criteria remain useful, they cannot be applied in all cases as self-evident rules for determining the nature of an experience (Marzanski and Bratton, 2002; Rashed, 2010).”
BackgroundHearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Spirituality: A Road to Mental Health or Mental Illness
Sullivan, W. P. (2009) · Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought · doi:10.1080/15426430802643653 · Cited by 27
Maraldi, E. D. O., Taves, A., Moll, J., Hartle, L., Moreira‐de‐Oliveira, M. E., Bortolini, T., & Fischer, R. D. (2023) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-023-01875-8 · Cited by 23
“…Dein, 2010, 2017; Evrard, 2013, 2014; Fulford & Jackson, 1997; Harrison, 2009; Johnson & Friedman, 2008; Lukoff, 1985; Margolis & Elifson, 1983; Marzanski & Bratton, 2002; Maurano & Albuquerque, 2019; Ojalammi, 2019; Phillips III et al., 2009; Pierre, 2001; Pirta, 2014; Rashed, 2010; Saver &…”
Spiritual Emergency and Occupational Identity: A Transpersonal Perspective
Collins, M. (2007) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/030802260707001202 · Cited by 15
“Such thinking identifies how a spiritual emergency could be evaluated from a medical model perspective (Marzanowski and Bratton 2002); moreover, Shafranske (2000), adding further complexity to the discussion, reported that psychiatrists are three times less likely to be interested in spirituality…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Marzanski, M., & Bratton, M.
- Venue
- Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-371
- ISSN
- 1071-6076 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3303
- OpenAlex
- W2026730650
- Semantic Scholar
- 2ea7e575db55f81c58b73bd004ee3f5c03e5b336
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- religious experience, spiritual experience, psychopathology, psychotic symptoms, personal values, spirituality, Christian tradition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review