Diversity and the Influence of Friendship Groups in College
Abstract
As we enter a new millennium, American higher education continues to experience rapid racial and ethnic diversification in the student body. De-mographic projections indicate that increasing ethnic and racial diversity will continue beyond the year 2000 (Justiz, 1994; Levine & Associates, 1989). On some campuses, the pace of demographic change has been nothing short of dramatic. At the University of California, for example, White students1 still represented over 70 % of all undergraduates as late as 1984. Just six years later in 1990, however, the White student proportion had dropped to less than 60 % of all students (University of California, 1991) and only 46% of first-time freshmen (CPEC, 1995). American higher education has also experienced a fair amount of criti-cism and discussion of late, coincident with the increasing racial diversifi-Anthony Lising Antonio is Assistant Professor of Education and Assistant Director of the
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fraternity and sorority members scored lower on measures of interracial interactions and promotions of racial understanding than did nonmembers.
“In a similar study, fraternity and sorority members scored lower on measures of interracial interactions and promotions of racial understanding than did nonmembers (Antonio, 2001).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as Antonio, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,024 · see citing works
New Evidence on the Effects of Fraternity and Sorority Affiliation During the First Year of College
Martin, G. L., Hevel, M. S., Asel, A. M., & Pascarella, E. T. (2011) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2011.0062 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Shirley, Z. E. (2025) · University of North Texas Dissertation · doi:10.12794/metadc500187
- Authors
- Antonio, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Antonio, Anthony Lising
- Venue
- The Review of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-89
- ISSN
- 0162-5748 (ISSN-L)
- 1090-7009
- OpenAlex
- W2070894012
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 28.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of higher education/The review of higher education (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- racial and ethnic diversity, university students, friendship groups, peer groups, student body composition, college students of color
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review