The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Combining the interdisciplinary studies (primarily humanities) literature with the content analysis of 129 successful National Science Foundation proposals written predominantly by science and engineering faculty members, the authors identify five categories of learning outcomes for interdisciplinary graduate education: disciplinary grounding, integration, teamwork, communication, and critical awareness. They identify important parallels between humanities-based descriptions of interdisciplinary integration and implicit graduate learning outcomes hinted at by engineering and science faculty who more frequently work in teams. Applying the lens of interdisciplinary studies (humanities) to science and engineering provides important depth and focus to engineering and science interdisciplinary learning outcomes, particularly in detailing integration processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4 · Cited by 1,983 · cited 2×
“Olson and Olson (2000) define the term: Effective communication between people requires that the communicative exchange take place with respect to some level of common ground (Clark, 1996).”
BackgroundDesigning and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x · Cited by 866
Cited by
Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study
Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20029 · Cited by 458
Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20347 · Cited by 391
Millar, M. M. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.004 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K.
- Venue
- The Review of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-84
- ISSN
- 0162-5748 (ISSN-L)
- 1090-7009
- OpenAlex
- W2064305091
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/rhe.2010.0006
- The paper
- Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2010). Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes. The Review of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2010.0006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
