The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States
Abstract
This article investigates the basis for the frequently reported statement that ten percent of deaf persons are born to families with one or more deaf parents. The prevalence of deaf children born to deaf parents (deaf-of-deaf) is important because it is often cited when describing linguistic and educational advantages, along with social and cultural differences, associated with deaf children born to deaf parents compared to deaf children of hearing parents. This analysis provides a current estimate for the distribution of parental hearing status among deaf and hard of hearing students in United States using data from the Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth (1999�2000). This is the first national estimate that fully utilizes the distinction between children having deaf parents and hard of hearing parents, as well as hearing parents. The authors propose that the key demographic to report, other than that the overwhelming majority of deaf and hard of hearing students have hearing parents, is whether the child has one or two deaf parents. The annual survey findings indicate that less than five percent of deaf and hard of hearing students receiving special education are known to have at least one deaf parent, which is less than half of the presumed ten percent. Reasons for the difference between the present and previous estimates are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: successes and challenges
Lederberg, A. R., Schick, B., & Spencer, P. E. (2013) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029558 · Cited by 441
Early Sign Language Exposure and Cochlear Implantation Benefits
Geers, A. E., Mitchell, C. M., Warner-Czyz, A., Wang, N.-Y., Eisenberg, L. S., & the CDaCI Investigative Team (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-3489 · Cited by 322
How Many People Use ASL in the United States? Why Estimates Need Updating
Mitchell, R. E., Young, T. A., Bachleda, B., & Karchmer, M. A. (2006) · Sign Language Studies · doi:10.1353/sls.2006.0019 · Cited by 265
Self-citationSign Language and Spoken Language for Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review
Fitzpatrick, E. M., Hamel, C., Stevens, A., Pratt, M., Moher, D., Doucet, S. P., Neuss, D., Bernstein, A., & Na, E. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1974 · Cited by 123
The Role of Sign Language Narratives in Developing Identity for Deaf Children
Sutton-Spence (2010) · Journal of Folklore Research · doi:10.2979/jfolkrese.2010.47.3.265 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A.
- Venue
- Sign Language Studies
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-163
- ISSN
- 0302-1475 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-6263
- OpenAlex
- W2152873914
- Cited by
- 1,194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/sls.2004.0005
- The paper
- Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A. (2004). Chasing the Mythical Ten Percent: Parental Hearing Status of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in the United States. Sign Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.