The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legacies of American Slavery: Status Attainment among Southern Blacks after Emancipation
Abstract
This study examines the legacy of American slavery at the individual, intragenerational level by analyzing life-history data from roughly 1,400 ex-slaves and free blacks covering the antebellum and postbellum periods. We test a model of durable inequality that considers the potentially vicious circle created by status persistence across institutional regimes. Our findings suggest that the antebellum regime evidenced partial institutional reproduction in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, owing to the fact that the antebellum distinction of free blacks and slaves had durable status effects long after emancipation, but over time, black status attainment became largely decoupled from the internal hierarchy of slavery. Mediating effects, for example, the Freedmen Bureaus educational interventions and the black diaspora, also served to curtail the reproduction of antebellum status. Implications are pursued with respect to both institutional theory and stratification research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Shortly after emancipation, to stabilize the U.S. southern economy, which was based on agricultural production, the Union army encouraged newly emancipated African Americans to return to their former occupations (Ruef & Fletcher, 2003: 453).”
From Dress and Labor: An Intersectional Interpretation of Clothing and Adornment Artifacts Recovered from the Levi Jordan Plantation (2022) · cites this paper as Ruef & Fletcher, 2003: 453
In the citing paper
“Institutional structures of racism, classism, and sexism formed the foundation of wage, sharecropping, and tenant farming agricultural labor (Ruef & Fletcher, 2003: 447;Crouch, 2007: 69-92).”
From Dress and Labor: An Intersectional Interpretation of Clothing and Adornment Artifacts Recovered from the Levi Jordan Plantation (2022) · cites this paper as Ruef & Fletcher, 2003: 447
Citations
Cites
Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
(1969) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642 · Cited by 14,231
Mills, C. W. (1959) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1891592 · Cited by 8,907
The American Occupational Structure.
Blalock, H. M., Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D., & Tyree, A. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092399 · Cited by 4,412
A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/0049-089x(92)90017-b · Cited by 3,120
A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables
McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. J. (1975) · Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.1975.9989847 · Cited by 2,632
The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies.
Deane, G., Erikson, R. S., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1994) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579793 · Cited by 2,139
Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality.
Clark, D. L., Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1985) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393114 · Cited by 1,692
Institutions and Organizations.
Dacin, M. T., & Scott, W. R. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393661 · Cited by 1,584
The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935
Anderson, J. (1988) · doi:10.5149/uncp/9780807842218 · Cited by 1,410
Scenes of subjection: terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-2898 · Cited by 1,350
Cited by
Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133 · Cited by 410
Flewellen, A. O. (2022) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-022-09443-4 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruef, M., & Fletcher, B.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 445-480
- ISSN
- 0037-7732
- 1534-7605
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 60
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.