Counting on Kin: Social Networks, Social Support, and Child Health Status
Abstract
This article presents the results of new data collection in Mexico about the relationship between child well-being and social networks. Two research questions guide the analysis. First, under what conditions do networks generate greater (lesser) support? Second, what kinds of networks are associated with healthier children? We explore the health status effects of several dimensions of social networks, including network size, kinship roles, interaction (proximity, contact, and coresidence), and provision of financial and emotional support. Our key findings suggest that networks containing more extended kin and coresident ties offer greater support resources to mothers with young children, especially among the poorest households. We also find that network structures characterized by more social support and greater interaction with extended, rather than immediate, kin help sustain healthier children. Together these findings indicate the advantages of examining specific role relationships in network research among economically marginalized families and attest to the importance of social networks founded on principles of reciprocity, confianza, and compadrazgo to the well-being of Mexican families.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social support enhances the survival of an individual's children, meaning that being part of a supportive social network may increase reproductive success.
“Furthermore, social support enhances the survival of an individual’s children, meaning that being part of a supportive social network may increase reproductive success [5,6].”
From The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 239
- Authors
- Kana'iaupuni, S. M., Donato, K. M., Thompson-Colon, T., & Stainback, M.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- ORCID
- Donato, K. M.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1137-1164
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2008569321
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Forces (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Keywords
- social networks, social support, child health, kinship, extended kin, co-residence, network size, financial support, emotional support, mothers, poverty, trust, compadrazgo, reciprocity, Mexican families
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review