Cited by 148Health disparities and outcomesRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Racial Context, Black Immigration and the U.S. Black/White Health Disparity

Open access
Read, J. G., Emerson, M. O.·2005·Social Forces

Abstract

The United States' black/white health gap is an important consequence of racial inequality. The gap is large, shows little signs of declining, and explanations have been limited by lack of theory and data. A new direction that offers potential for theoretical development is a focus on black immigrants, a group that shares the same racial status as U.S.-born blacks but experiences significantly better health. Using new data on the 2000–2002 National Health Interview Surveys, we disaggregate black immigrants by region of birth and develop a thesis that emphasizes the interplay of selectivity and racial context of origin for understanding health disparities among black Americans, namely that majority white contexts have deleterious health effects. The results indicate that grouping together foreign-born blacks conceals important health differentials among this population. Compared to U.S.-born blacks, black immigrants from minority white (Africa, South America) and racially mixed (West Indies) regions have superior health, while those from majority white (Europe) regions fare no better. A similar gradient exists among black immigrants, with Africans faring the best, followed by South Americans, then West Indians, with European blacks having the poorest health. Though these findings are not the definitive test of our theory, they are suggestive. They point us to understanding the mechanisms in the United States — racial context — that worsen the health and well being of black Americans, foreign- and native-born alike.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/sof.2005.0120

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Read, J. G., & Emerson, M. O.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Venue
Social Forces
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
181-199
ISSN
  • 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-7605
OpenAlex
W2154196518
Cited by
148
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Forces (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
Black immigrants, racial context, racial inequality, region of birth, African immigrants, European immigrants, Caribbean immigrants, South American immigrants, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review