Racial Context, Black Immigration and the U.S. Black/White Health Disparity
Open accessAbstract
The United States' black/white health gap is an important consequence of racial inequality. The gap is large, shows little signs of declining, and explanations have been limited by lack of theory and data. A new direction that offers potential for theoretical development is a focus on black immigrants, a group that shares the same racial status as U.S.-born blacks but experiences significantly better health. Using new data on the 2000–2002 National Health Interview Surveys, we disaggregate black immigrants by region of birth and develop a thesis that emphasizes the interplay of selectivity and racial context of origin for understanding health disparities among black Americans, namely that majority white contexts have deleterious health effects. The results indicate that grouping together foreign-born blacks conceals important health differentials among this population. Compared to U.S.-born blacks, black immigrants from minority white (Africa, South America) and racially mixed (West Indies) regions have superior health, while those from majority white (Europe) regions fare no better. A similar gradient exists among black immigrants, with Africans faring the best, followed by South Americans, then West Indians, with European blacks having the poorest health. Though these findings are not the definitive test of our theory, they are suggestive. They point us to understanding the mechanisms in the United States — racial context — that worsen the health and well being of black Americans, foreign- and native-born alike.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensitivity to racism and racial discrimination varies across different black subgroups in the USA.
“This is brilliantly advanced in scholarships such as Blum (2002), Harrell et al. (2003), Read and Emerson (2005), where the authors contend that the sensitivity to racism and racial discrimination varies across different black subgroups in the USA.”
From Conceptualizing the Differences in the Perception and Internalization of Racism Between Black African Immigrants and African Americans in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as Read and Emerson (2005)
Cites
Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955359 · Cited by 8,598 · see citing works
Acculturation and coronary heart disease in Japanese-Americans
MARMOT, M. G., & SYME, S. L. (1976) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112296 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Invited commentary: “Race, racism, and the practice of epidemiology”
Jones, C. P. (2001) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/154.4.299 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lifecourse Social Conditions and Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Cognitive Aging
Glymour, M. M., & Manly, J. J. (2008) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-008-9064-z · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Mouzon, D. M., & McLean, J. S. (2017) · Ethnicity & Health · doi:10.1080/13557858.2016.1196652 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Mohammed, Z. (2025) · Genealogy · doi:10.3390/genealogy9040127
“This is brilliantly advanced in scholarships such as Blum (2002), Harrell et al. (2003), Read and Emerson (2005), where the authors contend that the sensitivity to racism and racial discrimination varies across different black subgroups in the USA.”
- Authors
- Read, J. G., & Emerson, M. O.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- ORCID
- Emerson, M. O.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-199
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2154196518
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Social Forces (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- Black immigrants, racial context, racial inequality, region of birth, African immigrants, European immigrants, Caribbean immigrants, South American immigrants, health disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review