Cited by 11Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Law and Policy

Dollars, Sense, and Penal Reform: Social Movements and the Future of the Carceral State

Gottschalk, Marie·2007·Social Research: An International Quarterly

Abstract

Marie Gottschalk Dollars, Sense, and Penal Reform: Social Movements and the Future of the Carceral State NEARLY ON E IN EVERY H U N D R E D ADULTS IN T H E U N IT E D STATES IS IN JAIL or prison today. In a period dom inated by calls to roll back the govern­ m ent in all areas of social and economic policy, we have witnessed its massive expansion in the realm of penal policy since the 1970s. The US incarceration rate is now m ore than 737 per 100,000 people, or 5 to 12 times the rate of W estern European countries and Japan (Harrison and Beck, 2006: 2; International Center for Prison Studies, n.d.). The reach of the US carceral state extends far beyond the 2.3 m illion m en and w om en currently in prison or jail in the United States. On any given day, over 7 million people—or 1 in every 32 adults—are incarcerated or on probation or parole (Glaze and Bonczar, 2006: 1). This rate of state supervision is unparalleled in US history. These overall figures on incarceration belie the enorm ous and disproportionate impact th at this bold and unprecedented social experi­ m ent has had on certain groups in US society. Ifcurrent trends continue, one in three black m en and one in six Hispanic m en are expected to spend some tim e in jail or prison during their lives (Bonczar, 2003: 1). The num ber ofincarcerated African-American m en has grown so rapidly over the past quarter-century that more black m en are behind bars than enrolled in colleges and universities (Butterfield, 2002: A-1…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/sor.2007.0055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gottschalk calls for experts to view engaging the scholarly, public and political arenas in discussions about the future of the carceral state and make this a leading political and public policy area, as part of their professional responsibility.

    “Gottschalk (2007Gottschalk ( , 2015) ) calls for experts to view engaging the scholarly, public and political arenas in discussions about the future of the carceral state and make this a leading political and public policy area, as part of their professional responsibility.”

    From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Gottschalk, 2007

Cited by

Authors
Gottschalk, M.
Corresponding author
Gottschalk, Marie
Venue
Social Research: An International Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2007-06
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
669-694
ISSN
  • 0037-783X (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-768X
OpenAlex
W1832270475
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social research (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
carceral state, penal reform, social movements, mass incarceration, prison costs, prison privatization, racial disparities in incarceration, African American men, nonviolent offenders, sentencing reform, political economy of punishment, United States prison system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review