Abolition Is A Constant Struggle: Five Lessons from Minneapolis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The roots of abolition in Canada and the United States have strengthened in the wake of COVID-19, with grassroots-led work by Black, Indigenous and People of Colour (BIPOC) seeking supports for criminalized people, immediate decarceration and long-term abolition.
“The roots of abolition in Canada (Chartrand, 2021) and the United States (Chua, 2020) have strengthened in the wake of COVID-19, with grassroots-led work by Black, Indigenous and People of Colour (BIPOC) seeking supports for criminalized people, immediate decarceration and long-term abolition.”
From Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science (2023) · cites this paper as Chua, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science
Mussell, L. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423923000288 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chua, C.
- Corresponding author
- Chua, Charmaine
- ORCID
- Chua, Charmaine
- Venue
- Theory & Event
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4S
- Pages
- S-127-S-147
- ISSN
- 1092-311X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381788116
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theory & Event (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Keywords
- abolition, Minneapolis, abolitionism, social movements, police reform, decarceration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
