The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Taste of the Ocean: Jiaoran’s Theory of Poetry
Abstract
This essay seeks to place Jiaoran’s 皎然 views on poetry in the context of contemporary religious developments and also in relation to the literary heritage of the Six Dynasties. Jiaoran’s key concept of zuoyong 作用 “creating an effect” is likely influenced by the Chan belief in the identity of practice and insight, as in the sermons of Mazu Daoyi 馬祖道一. Jiaoran’s views on the poetry of the past, like his theory of composition, typically assign priority to idiosyncratic styles or literary innovations over the continuity of tradition. In this respect he stands in stark contrast with Liu Xie 劉勰, and an extended contrast of the two critics demonstrates how innovative Jiaoran can be even when his critical vocabulary is conservative. Jiaoran’s special admiration for Xie Lingyun 謝靈運 also tends to elevate Xie outside of his historical milieu, as Jiaoran attributes his greatness to transcendent spiritual insight. Throughout his work Jiaoran asserts the Chan-like view that a moment of poetic creativity can outweigh centuries of tradition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dewei was the editor of a portion of Xutang heshang yulu.
“Dewei was the editor of a portion of Xutang heshang yulu”
From Returning Empty-Handed: Reading the Yifanfeng Corpus as Buddhist Parting Poetry (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
Dewei was a close disciple of Xutang.
“The author of this poem, Dewei, was a close disciple of Xutang.”
From Returning Empty-Handed: Reading the Yifanfeng Corpus as Buddhist Parting Poetry (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
Dewei was honored in a poem by Xutang that survives in the Tokugawa Art Museum of Nagoya dated 1254.
“was honored in a poem by Xutang that survives in the Tokugawa Art Museum of Nagoya dated 1254.”
From Returning Empty-Handed: Reading the Yifanfeng Corpus as Buddhist Parting Poetry (2017) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zen and the “Image” in Tang Poetry
Barrett, T. (2020) · British Journal of Chinese Studies · doi:10.51661/bjocs.v10i0.58 · Cited by 1
Returning Empty-Handed: Reading the Yifanfeng Corpus as Buddhist Parting Poetry
Protass, J. (2017) · Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture · doi:10.1215/23290048-4179541 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, N. M.
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Nicholas Morrow
- Venue
- Tang Studies
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 0737-5034 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-7633
- OpenAlex
- W4300452853
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tang Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- Six Dynasties poetry, Chinese literary criticism, Zen Buddhism, Liu Xie, Xie Lingyun, poetic innovation, literary tradition, Tang poetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review