The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technology : The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept
Abstract
When the word technology was introduced into American English in the nineteenth century, it referred to the study of—or treatises in—the mechanic arts. It did not achieve currency as a reference to those arts as such until c. 1900–1930. By the 1840s, however, when Daniel Webster eloquently summarized the remarkable transformation of life attributable to advances in science and what later would come to be called technology , public discourse was filled with evidence of a semantic void that eventually would be filled by the concept—the word— technology . Two kinds of development—one conceptual or ideological, and the other substantive or mechanical—created the need for the new concept. By the end of the century it had become evident that Webster had been seeking to identify—to name—a novel form of human power with far greater efficacy and scope than that previously ascribed to the mechanic or useful arts. The new power is what we call technology .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
What Is the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance? Conceptions, Causes, and Assessment
Slayton, R. (2017) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00267 · Cited by 224
Anthony, C. (2021) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392211016755 · Cited by 191
Anthony, C. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0334 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Marx, L.
- Venue
- Technology and Culture
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 561-577
- ISSN
- 0040-165X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-3729
- OpenAlex
- W2028576790
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology : The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/tech.2010.0009
- The paper
- Marx, L. (2010). Technology : The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept. Technology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2010.0009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.