Not African? Contested Origins of Wax Print and Its High-Fashion Appropriation
Abstract
Abstract: In 2017, British fashion designer Stella McCartney’s 2018 spring collection, featuring clothing in prints widely regarded as African, was criticized by commentators as an act of cultural appropriation. Similar criticism emerged two years later when the House of Dior used African prints in its Resort 2020 collection. This was despite the fact that in the case of Dior, the fashion house worked with textile designers in Côte d’Ivoire. Some of the responses to the charges of appropriation included the claim that “African fabric…isn’t African” and noted the Dutch-mediated Indonesian origins of wax prints made for the African market and claimed by many as African culture; they also pointed to the provenance of the fabrics used in both collections in the Dutch corporation, Vlisco (in the case of McCartney), and its Ivorian subsidiary, Uniwax (in the case of Dior). Yet other voices questioned the relative merits of wax prints and handmade indigenous fabrics as markers of “African-ness.” Drawing on media coverage of the two collections and the debates they generated, as well as scholarship on the history of the prints, this article explores the contested origins of these textiles. It considers the labor of African market women in wax print’s aesthetic development, and the cultural contexts and consumption practices that inform its circulation and value in African societies and markets and beyond. Drawing comparisons with the history of handmade kente cloth from the Asante people of Ghana, and practices and values around the consumption and circulation of kente, the article seeks to identify criteria that can guide in responding to the contested origin claims around the prints in the McCartney collection of 2017 and the Dior collection of 2019. Using those criteria, it then examines the claims of appropriation in the specific instances of the two collections and, more generally, in the debates around the appropriation of African textiles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
African Textiles, Fashionable Textiles: A Historiography
Fee, S. (2023) · African Arts · doi:10.1162/afar_a_00715 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boateng, B.
- Corresponding author
- Boateng, Boatema
- Venue
- The Textile Museum Journal
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118-137
- ISSN
- 0083-7407 (ISSN-L)
- 2475-8825
- OpenAlex
- W4401030686
- Semantic Scholar
- 3e32f5da8f7ac91f353223c9724cca062258d77c
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Textile Museum journal. (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Social Issues and Sustainability
- Keywords
- cultural appropriation, Stella McCartney, African textiles, Kente cloth, Asante, Côte d'Ivoire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review