The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Did Government Decentralization Cause China's Economic Miracle?
Abstract
Many scholars attribute China's market reforms and the remarkable economic performance they have fostered in part to the country's political and fiscal decentralization. Political decentralization is said to have stimulated local policy experiments and restrained predatory central interventions. Fiscal decentralization is thought to have motivated local officials to promote development and harden enterprises' budget constraints. The locally diversified structure of the prereform economy is said to have facilitated liberalization. Reexamining these arguments, the authors find that none establishes a convincing link between political or fiscal decentralization and China's successes. They suggest an alternative view of the reform process in which growth-enhancing policies emerged from competition between promarket and conservative factions in Beijing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
China since Tiananmen: The Politics of Transition
Fewsmith, J. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790959 · Cited by 152
Cited by
Gehlbach, S., & Keefer, P. (2011) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2011.04.002 · Cited by 429
China's Local Political Budget Cycles
Guo, G. (2009) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00390.x · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Cai, H., & Treisman, D.
- Venue
- World Politics
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 505-535
- ISSN
- 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3338
- OpenAlex
- W2124536339
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Did Government Decentralization Cause China's Economic Miracle? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/wp.2007.0005
- The paper
- Cai, H., & Treisman, D. (2006). Did Government Decentralization Cause China's Economic Miracle? World Politics. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2007.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.