The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion
Abstract
Why do secular states pursue substantially different policies toward religion? The United States, France, and Turkey are secular states that lack any official religion and have legal systems free from religious control. The French and Turkish states have banned students' headscarves in public schools, whereas the U.S. has allowed students to wear religious symbols and attire. Using the method of process tracing, the author argues that state policies toward religion are the result of ideological struggles. In France and Turkey the dominant ideology is “assertive secularism,” which aims to exclude religion from the public sphere, while in the U.S., it is “passive secularism,” which tolerates public visibility of religion. Whether assertive or passive secularism became dominant in a particular case was the result of the particular historical conditions during the secular state-building period, especially the presence or absence of an ancien regime based on a marriage of monarchy and hegemonic religion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
Reid, A., & Anderson, B. (1985) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2759245 · Cited by 25,901
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094
The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80966-1 · Cited by 7,457
Eley, G., & Gellner, E. (1984) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070853 · Cited by 6,911
De Tocqueville, A. (2010) · The Two Narratives of Political Economy · doi:10.1002/9781118011690.ch12 · Cited by 6,286
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order
Evans, P., & Huntington, S. P. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654621 · Cited by 4,865
From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology
Thorne, S. E., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/793261 · Cited by 3,642
Path dependence in historical sociology
Mahoney, J. (2000) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1023/a:1007113830879 · Cited by 3,469
Cited by
Has the Study of Global Politics Found Religion?
Philpott, D. (2009) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.053006.125448 · Cited by 263
Religious Politics in Turkey: From the Birth of the Republic to the AKP
Lord, C. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108638906 · Cited by 174
Religious secularity: A vision for revisionist political Islam
Ghobadzadeh, N. (2013) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453713507014 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuru, A. T.
- Venue
- World Politics
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 568-594
- ISSN
- 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3338
- OpenAlex
- W2113697521
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/wp.2008.0005
- The paper
- Kuru, A. T. (2007). Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion. World Politics. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2008.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.