The DOI matches its Crossref record.
12. The Spread of Sanskrit in Southeast Asia
Abstract
Sanskrit makes its first appearance in inscriptions in South Asia during the early centuries of the Common Era.It then gradually takes over and becomes the inscriptional language par excellence in the whole of the South Asian subcontinent and much of Southeast Asia.For almost a thousand years Sanskrit 'rules' in this enormous domain.Sheldon Pollock (1996, 2006) speaks for this reason of the 'Sanskrit cosmopolis', which he dates approximately between ce 300 and 1300.How do we explain the strange vicissitudes of the Sanskrit language?Was it a lingua franca for trade, international business and cultural promotion?Is the spread of Sanskrit into Southeast Asia to be explained by the same reasons that also explain its spread within the Indian subcontinent?Pollock, by using the expression 'Sanskrit cosmopolis', draws attention to the political dimension of the spread of Sanskrit.One defining feature of the Sanskrit cosmopolis, he states (1996: 197), 'is that Sanskrit became the premiere instrument of political expression in the polities that comprised it, those of most of South and much of Southeast Asia'.He rightly points out that Sanskrit was not a lingua franca: 1 Sanskrit's spread was effected by traditional intellectuals and religious professionals, often following in the train of scattered groups of traders and adventurers, and carrying with them disparate and decidedly uncanonized texts of a wide variety of competing religious orders, ® Saiva, Buddhist, Vai] s] nava, and others.[...]There is little to suggest [...] that Sanskrit was an everyday medium of communication in South let alone Southeast Asia, or that [it] ever functioned as a language-of-trade, a bridge-, link-, or koiné language or lingua franca (except among those traditional intellectuals) [...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brahmans were key to the successful spread of Sanskrit and Brahmanical ideas in Southeast Asia.
“Johannes Bronkhorst (2011) has pointed out that Brahmans were key to the successful spread of Sanskrit and Brahmanical ideas in Southeast Asia.”
From The Spread of Buddhism to China: A Re-examination of the Buddhist Interactions between Ancient India and China (2012) · cites this paper as Bronkhorst 2011
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sen, T. (2012) · China Report · doi:10.1177/000944551104800202 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Bronkhorst, J.
- Corresponding author
- Johannes Bronkhorst
- Venue
- Early Interactions between South and Southeast Asia
- Publisher
- ISEAS Publishing
- Published
- 2011-12-31
- Pages
- 263-276
- OpenAlex
- W4211168671
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ISEAS Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Sanskrit, Sanskrit inscription, Southeast Asia, South Asia, lingua franca, trade and cultural exchange, political expression, religious professionals, Sheldon Pollock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review