Cited by 1,082Globalization, Economics, and PoliciesGlobalization and political ideologiesGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies

The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy

Rodrik, Dani·2011·ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN

Abstract

The Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE) is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on economic issues pertaining to countries in the region – defined as the ten members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and East Timor. JSEAE welcomes articles using orthodox economic approaches as well as those of a more heterodox nature. Oriented at both researchers and policy-makers, the journal seeks to reconcile the ideals of relevance, methodological rigour, and accessibility. Published by the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute tri-annually, JSEAE includes: articles based on original research; research notes; review articles; and book reviews. Once a year, the Journal publishes a Special Issue devoted entirely to a topic of import for the region. Up until April 2013, JSEAE was published as the ASEAN Economic Bulletin (AEB). However, following new developments in the regional and global context, as well as the establishment of new multi-lateral trading agreements including countries in the region, the Directorship of ISEAS and AEB’s Editorial Board decided to change the journal’s name. While its name has changed, JSEAE remains committed to being the premier economic journal for Southeast Asian academicians and policy-makers, as well as anyone with an interest in the region. All research articles in the journal have undergone rigorous peer-review. The process consists of initial screening by the Co-Editors and Associate Editor, followed by double-blind refereeing; two revie…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1355/ae28-3k

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering doubts about the sustainability of democracy in an integrated world.

    “but also doubts about the sustainability of democracy in an integrated world (Rodrik, 2011).”

    From What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? (2021) · cites this paper as Rodrik, 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrik, D.
Corresponding author
Rodrik, Dani
Venue
ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN
Published
2011
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
420
ISSN
  • 2339-5095 (ISSN-L)
  • 0217-4472
OpenAlex
W2071256925
Cited by
1,082
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 32
FWCI
130.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Southeast Asian Economies (publishedVersion)
  • Southeast Asian Economies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Globalization, Economics, and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Keywords
globalization, democracy, global economy, global governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review