The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy
Abstract
The Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE) is a peer-reviewed journal focusing on economic issues pertaining to countries in the region – defined as the ten members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and East Timor. JSEAE welcomes articles using orthodox economic approaches as well as those of a more heterodox nature. Oriented at both researchers and policy-makers, the journal seeks to reconcile the ideals of relevance, methodological rigour, and accessibility. Published by the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute tri-annually, JSEAE includes: articles based on original research; research notes; review articles; and book reviews. Once a year, the Journal publishes a Special Issue devoted entirely to a topic of import for the region. Up until April 2013, JSEAE was published as the ASEAN Economic Bulletin (AEB). However, following new developments in the regional and global context, as well as the establishment of new multi-lateral trading agreements including countries in the region, the Directorship of ISEAS and AEB’s Editorial Board decided to change the journal’s name. While its name has changed, JSEAE remains committed to being the premier economic journal for Southeast Asian academicians and policy-makers, as well as anyone with an interest in the region. All research articles in the journal have undergone rigorous peer-review. The process consists of initial screening by the Co-Editors and Associate Editor, followed by double-blind refereeing; two revie…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The emergence of corporate giants in the global economy is triggering doubts about the sustainability of democracy in an integrated world.
“but also doubts about the sustainability of democracy in an integrated world (Rodrik, 2011).”
From What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy? (2021) · cites this paper as Rodrik, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change
Ottersen, O. P., Dasgupta, J., Blouin, C., Buss, P., Chongsuvivatwong, V., Frenk, J., Fukuda-Parr, S., Gawanas, B. P., Giacaman, R., Gyapong, J., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62407-1 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
The emergence of global systemic risk
Centeno, M. A., Nag, M., Patterson, T. S., Shaver, A., & Windawi, A. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112317 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Trading Places: Accessing Land in African Cities
(2013) · doi:10.47622/978-1-920489-99-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
What is the business of business? Who said we had to be greedy?
Fleurbaey, M., & Minnaar, J. (2021) · RIMHE : Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise · doi:10.3917/rimhe.042.0069
- Authors
- Rodrik, D.
- Corresponding author
- Rodrik, Dani
- ORCID
- Rodrik, Dani
- Venue
- ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN
- Publisher
- ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420
- ISSN
- 2339-5095 (ISSN-L)
- 0217-4472
- OpenAlex
- W2071256925
- Cited by
- 1,082
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 130.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Southeast Asian Economies (publishedVersion)
- Southeast Asian Economies
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Globalization, Economics, and Policies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
- Keywords
- globalization, democracy, global economy, global governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review