Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

VEGF Scaffolds Enhance Angiogenesis and Bone Regeneration in Irradiated Osseous Defects

Kaigler, Darnell, Wang, Zhuo, Horger, Kim, Mooney, David J, Krebsbach, Paul H·2006·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Bone regeneration is challenging in sites where the blood supply has been compromised by radiation. We examined the potential of a growth factor (VEGF) delivery system to enhance angiogenesis and bone formation in irradiated calvarial defects. VEGF-releasing polymers significantly increased blood vessel density and vascular perfusion in irradiated defects and increased bone formation relative to control conditions. Introduction: Radiation therapy causes damage to tissues and inhibits its regenerative capacity. Tissue injury from radiation is in large part caused by a compromised vascular supply and reduced perfusion of tissues. The aim of this study was to determine if delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from a biodegradable PLGA (copolymer of d,l-lactide and glycolide) scaffold could enhance neovascularization and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects. Materials and Methods: An isolated area of the calvarium of Fisher rats was irradiated (12 Gy) 2 weeks preoperatively, and two 3.5-mm osseous defects were created in this area, followed by the placement of PLGA scaffolds or VEGF scaffolds (PLGA scaffolds with incorporated VEGF) into the defects. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was performed to measure perfusion of these areas at 1, 2, and 6 weeks. Implants were retrieved at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and histologic and μCT analyses were performed to determine neovascularization and bone regeneration. Results: Histological analyses revealed statistically significant increases in blood vessel formation (>2-fold) and function (30%) within the VEGF scaffolds compared with PLGA scaffolds. Additionally, evaluation of bone regeneration through bone histomorphometric and μCT analyses revealed significantly greater bone coverage (26.36 ± 6.91% versus 7.05 ± 2.09% [SD]) and increased BMD (130.80 ± 58.05 versus 71.28 ± 42.94 mg/cm3) in VEGF scaffolds compared with PLGA scaffolds. Conclusions: Our findings show that VEGF scaffolds have the ability to enhance neovascularization and bone regeneration in irradiated osseous defects, outlining a novel approach for engineering tissues in hypovascular environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.060120

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Kaigler, D., Wang, Z., Horger, K., Mooney, D. J., & Krebsbach, P. H.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
735-744
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2147014530
Cited by
340
References
33
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VEGF Scaffolds Enhance Angiogenesis and Bone Regeneration in Irradiated Osseous Defects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.060120
The paper
Kaigler, D., Wang, Z., Horger, K., Mooney, D. J., & Krebsbach, P. H. (2006). VEGF Scaffolds Enhance Angiogenesis and Bone Regeneration in Irradiated Osseous Defects. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.