The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Our Age-Related Bone Loss: Insights from a New Paradigm
Abstract
Bone strength and “mass” normally adapt to the largest voluntary loads on bones. The loads come from muscles, not body weight. Bone modeling can increase bone strength and “mass,” bone remodeling can conserve or reduce them, and each can turn ON and OFF in response to its own threshold range of bone strains. During growth, the loads on bones from body weight and muscle forces increase, and modeling correspondingly increases bone strength and “mass.” In young adults those loads usually plateau, so bone strength can “catch up” and modeling can turn OFF. Meanwhile remodeling keeps existing bone. After about 30 years of age, muscle strength usually decreases. In aging adults this would put bones that had adapted to stronger young-adult muscles into partial disuse and make remodeling begin to reduce their strength and “mass,” as disuse regularly does in experimental situations in other mammals, both growing and adult. Those changes associate strongly with the size of the bone strains caused by the loads on bone. While nonmechanical effects associated with aging should contribute to that age-related bone loss too, a new skeletal paradigm suggests the above mechanical influences would dominate control of the process in time and anatomical space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Riggs, B. L., Khosla, S., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.3.0465 · Cited by 1,846
Optimal protein intake in the elderly
Wolfe, R. R., Miller, S. L., & Miller, K. B. (2008) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.008 · Cited by 456
Pathophysiology of Age-Related Bone Loss and Osteoporosis
Khosla, S., & Riggs, B. L. (2005) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2005.07.009 · Cited by 376
Osteosarcopenic obesity: the role of bone, muscle, and fat on health
Ormsbee, M. J., Prado, C. M., Ilich, J. Z., Purcell, S., Siervo, M., Folsom, A., & Panton, L. (2014) · Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1007/s13539-014-0146-x · Cited by 257
“Although the term has only recently been proposed, the association of muscle and bone mass has been extensively studied [37–41].”
Clarke, B. L., & Khosla, S. (2010) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2010.02.014 · Cited by 221
Bemben, D. A., Palmer, I. J., Bemben, M. G., & Knehans, A. W. (2010) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.06.019 · Cited by 111
Bering, T., Diniz, K. G. D., Coelho, M. P. P., Vieira, D. A., Soares, M. M. S., Kakehasi, A. M., Correia, M. I. T. D., Teixeira, R., Queiroz, D. M. M., Rocha, G. A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12269 · Cited by 73
Piasecki, J., Ireland, A., Piasecki, M., Cameron, J., McPhee, J. S., & Degens, H. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.13062 · Cited by 21
Osteocyte Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation upon mechanical loading is altered in ovariectomized mice
Jackson, E., Lara-Castillo, N., Akhter, M. P., Dallas, M., Scott, J. M., Ganesh, T., & Johnson, M. L. (2021) · Bone Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101129 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, H. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1539-1546
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2014492486
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.