Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Human Long Bones: Evaluation of In Vitro and In Vivo Precision

Open access
Sievänen, Harri, Koskue, Virpi, Rauhio, Anne, Kannus, Pekka, Heinonen, Ari, Vuori, Ilkka·1998·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Despite the excellent performance in clinical practice and research, the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is restricted by the inherent planar nature of the measurement and the inability to discriminate between trabecular and cortical components of bone. Recently, a new peripheral tomographic scanner (Norland/Stratec XCT 3000) was introduced for versatile measurements of human long bone characteristics in vivo, including trabecular and cortical density (TrD and CoD, respectively), respective cross-sectional areas (TrA and CoA), bone strength index (BSI), and bone mineral content (BMC). We evaluated the technical performance of the scanner using different phantoms and determined the in vivo precision of the above-noted applications by measuring twice several sites of upper and lower limbs of 19 and 36 volunteers aged 23–60 years. The bone scans were performed, with intermediate positioning of the subject, at two different anatomic sites of the forearm, three sites of the upper arm, three sites of the shank, and two sites of the thigh, with the respective skeletal sites representing different bone compositions and sizes. According to phantom measurements, the XCT 3000 appeared to be a highly linear, stable, and precise (coefficient of variation [CV] about 0.2%) system in vitro. The soft tissue thickness, however, had a linear effect on density values and a nonlinear effect on BMC, whereas the effect on cross-sectional area was marginal. The in vivo root mean square CV (CVrms) values for the long bone ends ranged from 0.9% (distal tibia) to 2.7% (distal femur) for TrD, from 1.8% (distal femur) to 7.6% (distal radius) for TrA, from 2.0% (distal tibia) to 6.8% (proximal tibia) for CoD, from 1.8% (distal femur) to 4.9% (proximal tibia) for CoA, and from 4.2% (distal tibia) to 7.7% (distal radius) for BSI. The corresponding CVrms values for the long bone shafts ranged from 0.5% (midshaft of humerus) to 1.4% (midshaft of fibula) for CoD, from 1.7% (midshaft of tibia) to 4.6% (proximal shaft of humerus) for CoA, and from 2.5% (midshaft of tibia) to 7.5% (proximal shaft of humerus) for BSI. There was no interoperator effect on precision. This study provided, for the first time, independent precision data for the new XCT 3000 peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scanner in various applications of human long bones (radius, ulna, humerus, tibia, fibula, and femur) and gave practical guidelines and procedures on how to employ this versatile method in clinical and research applications. The technical performance of the tested system was excellent and it allowed, with a low radiation dose, precise in vivo evaluation of trabecular and cortical density, cross-sectional area, and BMC of selected skeletal sites. The potential effect of the soft tissue thickness on density and mineral content values need to be recognized. The pQCT measurement seems to be useful in supplementing the integral, planar DXA data and obviously opens new possibilities for clinical practice and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.871

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sievänen, H., Koskue, V., Rauhio, A., Kannus, P., Heinonen, A., & Vuori, I.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
871-882
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2089410486
Cited by
266
References
1
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.