Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic Regulation of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Strength and Microstructure in Inbred Strains of Mice

Turner, Charles H., Hsieh, Yeou-Fang, Müller, Ralph, Bouxsein, Mary L., Baylink, David J., Rosen, Clifford J., Grynpas, Marc D., Donahue, Leah Rae, Beamer, Wesley G.·2000·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

The inbred strains of mice C57BL/6J (B6) and C3H/HeJ (C3H) have very different femoral peak bone densities and may serve as models for studying the genetic regulation of bone mass. Our objective was to further define the bone biomechanics and microstructure of these two inbred strains. Microarchitecture of the proximal femur, femoral midshaft, and lumbar vertebrae were evaluated in three dimensions using microcomputed tomography (μCT) with an isotropic voxel size of 17 μm. Mineralization of the distal femur was determined using quantitative back-scatter electron (BSE) imaging. μCT images suggested that C3H mice had thicker femoral and vertebral cortices compared with B6. The C3H bone tissue also was more highly mineralized. However, C3H mice had few trabeculae in the vertebral bodies, femoral neck, and greater trochanter. The trabecular number (Tb.N) in the C3H vertebral bodies was about half of that in B6 vertebrae (2.8−1 ± 0.1 mm−1 vs. 5.1−1 ± 0.2 mm−1; p < 0.0001). The thick, more highly mineralized femoral cortex of C3H mice resulted in greater bending strength of the femoral diaphysis (62.1 ± 1.2N vs. 27.4 ± 0.5N, p < 0.0001). In contrast, strengths of the lumbar vertebra were not significantly different between inbred strains (p = 0.5), presumably because the thicker cortices were combined with inferior trabecular structure in the vertebrae of C3H mice. These results indicate that C3H mice benefit from alleles that enhance femoral strength but paradoxically are deficient in trabecular bone structure in the lumbar vertebrae.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.1126

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Turner, C. H., Hsieh, Y.-F., Müller, R., Bouxsein, M. L., Baylink, D. J., Rosen, C. J., Grynpas, M. D., Donahue, L. R., & Beamer, W. G.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1126-1131
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2017472612
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Regulation of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Strength and Microstructure in Inbred Strains of Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.1126
The paper
Turner, C. H., Hsieh, Y.-F., Müller, R., Bouxsein, M. L., Baylink, D. J., Rosen, C. J., Grynpas, M. D., Donahue, L. R., & Beamer, W. G. (2000). Genetic Regulation of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Strength and Microstructure in Inbred Strains of Mice. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.6.1126

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.