The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Accelerates Rat Femoral Fracture Healing by Acting on the Various Cellular Reactions in the Fracture Callus
Open accessAbstract
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been shown to accelerate fracture healing in both animal models and clinical trials, but the mechanism of action remains unclear. In fracture healing, various consecutive cellular reactions occurred until repair. We investigated whether the advanced effects of LIPUS depended on the duration and timing of LIPUS treatment in a rat closed femoral fracture model to determine the target of LIPUS in the healing process. Sixty-nine Long-Evans male rats that have bilateral closed femoral fractures were used. The right femur was exposed to LIPUS (30 mW/cm2 spatial and temporal average [SATA], for 20 minutes/day), and the left femur was used as a control. Rats were divided into four groups according to timing and duration of treatment (Ph-1, days 1–8; Ph-2, days 9–16; Ph-3, days 17–24; throughout [T], days 1–24 after the fracture). Animals were killed on day 25. After radiographs and microfocus X-ray computed tomography (μCT) tomograms were taken, the hard callus area (HCA), bone mineral content (BMC) at the fracture site, and mechanical torsion properties were measured, and histological analysis was conducted. Interestingly, the maximum torque of the LIPUS-treated femur was significantly greater than that of the controls in all groups without any changes in HCA and BMC. The multiviewing of three-dimensional (3D) μCT reconstructions and histology supported our findings that the partial LIPUS treatment time was able to accelerate healing, but longer treatment was more effective. These results suggest that LIPUS acts on some cellular reactions involved in each phase of the healing process such as inflammatory reaction, angiogenesis, chondrogenesis, intramembranous ossification, endochondral ossification, and bone remodeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Angiogenesis in bone regeneration
Hankenson, K. D., Dishowitz, M., Gray, C., & Schenker, M. (2011) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.035 · Cited by 560
Nishimura, M., Chiba, M., Ohashi, T., Sato, M., Shimizu, Y., Igarashi, K., & Mitani, H. (2008) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.046 · Cited by 268
Hannemann, P. F. W., Mommers, E. H. H., Schots, J. P. M., Brink, P. R. G., & Poeze, M. (2014) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-014-2014-8 · Cited by 151
Mansjur, K. Q., Kuroda, S., Izawa, T., Maeda, Y., Sato, M., Watanabe, K., Horiuchi, S., & Tanaka, E. (2016) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-015-1533-y · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Azuma, Y., Ito, M., Harada, Y., Takagi, H., Ohta, T., & Jingushi, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 671-680
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2086197605
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Accelerates Rat Femoral Fracture Healing by Acting on the Various Cellular Reactions in the Fracture Callus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.4.671
- The paper
- Azuma, Y., Ito, M., Harada, Y., Takagi, H., Ohta, T., & Jingushi, S. (2001). Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Accelerates Rat Femoral Fracture Healing by Acting on the Various Cellular Reactions in the Fracture Callus. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.4.671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.