The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Mechanical Loading on the Size and Shape of Bone in Pre-, Peri-, and Postpubertal Girls: A Study in Tennis Players
Open accessAbstract
Exercise during growth results in biologically important increases in bone mineral content (BMC). The aim of this study was to determine whether the effects of loading were site specific and depended on the maturational stage of the region. BMC and humeral dimensions were determined using DXA and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the loaded and nonloaded arms in 47 competitive female tennis players aged 8–17 years. Periosteal (external) cross-sectional area (CSA), cortical area, medullary area, and the polar second moments of area (IP, mm4) were calculated at the mid and distal sites in the loaded and nonloaded arms. BMC and IP of the humerus were 11–14% greater in the loaded arm than in the nonloaded arm in prepubertal players and did not increase further in peri- or postpubertal players despite longer duration of loading (both, p < 0.01). The higher BMC was the result of a 7–11% greater cortical area in the prepubertal players due to greater periosteal than medullary expansion at the midhumerus and a greater periosteal expansion alone at the distal humerus. Loading late in puberty resulted in medullary contraction. Growth and the effects of loading are region and surface specific, with periosteal apposition before puberty accounting for the increase in the bone's resistance to torsion and endocortical contraction contributing late in puberty conferring little increase in resistance to torsion. Increasing the bone's resistance to torsion is achieved by modifying bone shape and mass, not necessarily bone density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: A tutorial
Turner, C. H., & Burr, D. B. (1993) · Bone · doi:10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-k · Cited by 1,666
Self-citation
Cited by
Who’s afraid of the big bad Wolff?: “Wolff’s law” and bone functional adaptation
Ruff, C., Holt, B., & Trinkaus, E. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20371 · Cited by 994
Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology
Almeida, M., Laurent, M. R., Dubois, V., Claessens, F., O'Brien, C. A., Bouillon, R., Vanderschueren, D., & Manolagas, S. C. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2015 · Cited by 860
The aging of Wolff’s “law”: Ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone
Pearson, O. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20155 · Cited by 745
Nikander, R., Sievänen, H., Heinonen, A., Daly, R. M., Uusi-Rasi, K., & Kannus, P. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-47 · Cited by 479
Self-citationExercise and Bone Mass in Adults
Guadalupe-Grau, A., Fuentes, T., Guerra, B., & Calbet, J. A. L. (2009) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200939060-00002 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Bass, S. L., Saxon, L., Daly, R. M., Turner, C. H., Robling, A. G., Seeman, E., & Stuckey, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2274-2280
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1973611633
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Mechanical Loading on the Size and Shape of Bone in Pre-, Peri-, and Postpubertal Girls: A Study in Tennis Players. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2274
- The paper
- Bass, S. L., Saxon, L., Daly, R. M., Turner, C. H., Robling, A. G., Seeman, E., & Stuckey, S. (2002). The Effect of Mechanical Loading on the Size and Shape of Bone in Pre-, Peri-, and Postpubertal Girls: A Study in Tennis Players. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.