The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations
Abstract
Devising a computational tool that assesses the thermodynamic stability of materials is among the most important steps required to build a “virtual laboratory,” where materials could be designed from first principles without relying on experimental input. Although the formalism that allows the calculation of solid-state phase diagrams from first principles is well established, its practical implementation remains a tedious process. The development of a fully automated algorithm to perform such calculations serves two purposes. First, it will make this powerful tool available to a large number of researchers. Second, it frees the calculation process from arbitrary parameters, guaranteeing that the results obtained are truly derived from the underlying first-principles calculations. The proposed algorithm formalizes the most difficult step of phase diagram calculations, namely the determination of the “cluster expanison,” which is a compact representation of the configurational dependence of the alloy’s energy. This is traditionally achieved by a fit of the unknown interaction parameters of the cluster expansion to a set of structural energies calculated from first principles. We present a formal statistical basis for the selection of both the interaction parameters to include in the cluster expansion and the structures to use to determine them. The proposed method relies on the concepts of cross-validation and variance minimization. An application to the calculation of the phase diagram of the Si-Ge, CaO-MgO, Ti-Al, and Cu-Au systems is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Cited by
Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects
Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., & Kim, C. (2017) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 · Cited by 1,945
Efficient stochastic generation of special quasirandom structures
van de Walle, A., Tiwary, P., de Jong, M., Olmsted, D. L., Asta, M., Dick, A., Shin, D., Wang, Y., Chen, L.-Q., & Liu, Z.-K. (2013) · Calphad · doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.006 · Cited by 1,648
CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling
Deng, B., Zhong, P., Jun, K., Riebesell, J., Han, K., Bartel, C. J., & Ceder, G. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 · Cited by 944
Self-citationHart, G. L. W., Mueller, T., Toher, C., & Curtarolo, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00340-w · Cited by 703
Metadata
- Authors
- Walle, A., & Ceder, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Phase Equilibria
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 348-359
- ISSN
- 1547-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1054-9714
- 1863-7345
- OpenAlex
- W1986575501
- Cited by
- 956
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1361/105497102770331596
- The paper
- Walle, A., & Ceder, G. (2002). Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations. Journal of Phase Equilibria. https://doi.org/10.1361/105497102770331596
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.