The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Overview of Content Analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244014522633 · Cited by 4,395
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND RELATED SUBJECTS
MOHAJAN, H. K. (2018) · Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People · doi:10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571 · Cited by 1,478
Cegielski, C. G., Allison Jones‐Farmer, L., Wu, Y., & Hazen, B. T. (2012) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574091211265350 · Cited by 258
Practical early prediction of students’ performance using machine learning and eXplainable AI
Jang, Y., Choi, S., Jung, H., & Kim, H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11120-6 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T.
- Venue
- The Marketing Review
- Publisher
- Westburn Publishers
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479-498
- ISSN
- 1469-347X (ISSN-L)
- 0000-0000
- OpenAlex
- W2060707028
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Overview of Content Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1362/146934703771910080
- The paper
- Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An Overview of Content Analysis. The Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934703771910080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
