CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 433Reproductive Health and ContraceptionInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives

Finer, Lawrence B., Frohwirth, Lori F., Dauphinee, Lindsay A., Singh, Susheela, Moore, Ann M.·2005·Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
DOI 10.1363/3711005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

CONTEXT: Understanding women's reasons for having abortions can inform public debate and policy regarding abortion and unwanted pregnancy. Demographic changes over the last two decades highlight the need for a reassessment of why women decide to have abortions. METHODS: In 2004, a structured survey was completed by 1,209 abortion patients at 11 large providers, and in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 women at four sites. Bivariate analyses examined differences in the reasons for abortion across subgroups, and multivariate logistic regression models assessed associations between respondent characteristics and reported reasons. RESULTS: The reasons most frequently cited were that having a child would interfere with a woman's education, work or ability to care for dependents (74%); that she could not afford a baby now (73%); and that she did not want to be a single mother or was having relationship problems (48%). Nearly four in 10 women said they had completed their childbearing, and almost one-third were not ready to have a child. Fewer than 1% said their parents' or partners' desire for them to have an abortion was the most important reason. Younger women often reported that they were unprepared for the transition to motherhood, while older women regularly cited their responsibility to dependents. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to have an abortion is typically motivated by multiple, diverse and interrelated reasons. The themes of responsibility to others and resource limitations, such as financial constraints and lack of partner support, recurred throughout the study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1363/3711005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–367 of 367

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Finer, L. B., Frohwirth, L. F., Dauphinee, L. A., Singh, S., & Moore, A. M.
ORCID
Venue
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09
Volume
37
Issue
03
Pages
110-118
ISSN
1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1363/3711005
OpenAlex
W4230122068
Cited by
433
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 3652 d)
Locations
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Keywords
abortion, reasons for abortion, women's reproductive choices, American women
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Abortion, Legal, Adolescent, Adult, Contraception, Decision Making, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Motivation, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Women's Rights, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Women's Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review