The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, United States, 2004
Abstract
CONTEXT: Each year, nearly one in four U.S. women at risk of unintended pregnancy experience one or more months of contraceptive nonuse. Understanding what factors are associated with risky contraceptive use patterns can inform programs and policies designed to reduce levels of unintended pregnancy. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 1,978 adult women at risk for unintended pregnancy was surveyed over the telephone in 2004. Respondents provided information on contraceptive use over the past 12 months. Multiple logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with different contraceptive use patterns. RESULTS: Ambivalence about avoiding pregnancy was strongly associated with both contraceptive nonuse and having a gap in use while remaining at risk of unintended pregnancy (odds ratios, 2.4 and 2.0, respectively). Other significant predictors of either of these risky contraceptive behaviors were having less than a college education, being black, being 35–44 years old, having infrequent sexual intercourse, not being in a current relationship, being dissatisfied with one’s method and believing that contraceptive service providers were not available to answer method‐related questions (1.7–3.8). CONCLUSIONS: Providers could better help women avoid unintended pregnancy by initiating regular assessments of method use difficulties, improving counseling on method choice and pregnancy risk, and identifying and assisting women at higher risk for inconsistent method use because of disadvantage, relationship characteristics or ambivalence about pregnancy prevention. In addition to providers’ efforts, broader societal commitment is critical for increasing contraceptive knowledge and expanding access to contraceptive care for all women who are at risk of having an unintended pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa gambling task
Cauffman, E., Shulman, E. P., Steinberg, L., Claus, E., Banich, M. T., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016128 · Cited by 488
Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Kost, K., Singh, S., Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., & Bankole, A. (2008) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013 · Cited by 444
Self-citationFactors Associated with Contraceptive Choice and Inconsistent Method Use, United States, 2004
Frost, J. J., & Darroch, J. E. (2008) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/4009408 · Cited by 381
Self-citationImpact of having a high-risk pregnancy on future postpartum contraceptive method choice
Kiykac Altinbas, S., Bayoglu Tekin, Y., Dilbaz, B., Kilic, S., Khalil, S. S., & Kandemir, O. (2014) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2014.06.006 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, J. J., Singh, S., & Finer, L. B.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- Guttmacher Institute
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 90-99
- ISSN
- 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-2393
- OpenAlex
- W2031546437
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, United States, 2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1363/3909007
- The paper
- Frost, J. J., Singh, S., & Finer, L. B. (2007). Factors Associated with Contraceptive Use and Nonuse, United States, 2004. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1363/3909007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.