The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors Associated with Contraceptive Choice and Inconsistent Method Use, United States, 2004
Abstract
CONTEXT: Pregnancies among contraceptive users account for nearly half of all unintended pregnancies and are almost entirely due to inconsistent or incorrect contraceptive use. Understanding what factors contribute to inconsistent contraceptive behavior can help efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy. METHODS: In 2004, a nationally representative sample of women aged 18–44 using reversible contraceptive methods were surveyed to examine factors associated with contraceptive choice and with inconsistent use of the pill and condoms. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the data. RESULTS: Contraceptive choice was associated with a range of socioeconomic and partnership characteristics, and with pregnancy‐, method‐ and provider‐related experiences and attitudes; inconsistent pill or condom use was associated mainly with partnership, experiential and attitudinal factors. For example, not having a college education was negatively associated with pill use (odds ratio, 0.6) and positively associated with use of long‐acting methods (1.8–1.9). Women for whom avoiding pregnancy was only a little or not important had reduced odds of using the pill (0.4) and elevated odds of using other methods, such as withdrawal or periodic abstinence (4.4), and of using condoms inconsistently (2.6). Use of a method chosen mostly out of dislike of other methods was positively associated with condom use (4.0) and negatively associated with use of the pill or long‐acting methods (0.4 for each). Women who were not completely satisfied with their method were more likely than others to use their method inconsistently (1.6 for pill users and 1.9 for condom users). CONCLUSIONS: Greater efforts are needed to provide women and their partners with a range of method options, to facilitate selection of methods that best suit their needs and circumstances, and to identify and assist users who are dissatisfied or are having difficulties using contraceptives effectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Adherence to Long‐Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Burkhart, P. V., & Sabaté, E. (2003) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.tb00001.x · Cited by 2,526
Contraceptive failure in the United States
Trussell, J. (2011) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021 · Cited by 1,588
Disparities in Rates of Unintended Pregnancy In the United States, 1994 and 2001
Finer, L. B., & Henshaw, S. K. (2006) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3809006 · Cited by 1,557
Emotional Conservatism: The Basis of Social Behavior?
AJZEN, I. (1980) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/019251 · Cited by 1,323
Johnson, K., Posner, S. F., Biermann, J., Cordero, J. F., Atrash, H. K., Parker, C. S., Boulet, S., & Curtis, M. G. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e506902006-001 · Cited by 837
Mosher, W. D., Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., & Willson, S. J. (2004) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e609122007-001 · Cited by 557
Miller, N. H., Hill, M., Kottke, T., & Ockene, I. S. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.4.1085 · Cited by 493
Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Kost, K., Singh, S., Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., & Bankole, A. (2008) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013 · Cited by 444
Contraceptive failure in the United States
Trussell, J. (2004) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2004.03.009 · Cited by 420
Cited by
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017 · Cited by 665
Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Kost, K., Singh, S., Vaughan, B., Trussell, J., & Bankole, A. (2008) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013 · Cited by 444
Family Planning and the Burden of Unintended Pregnancies
Tsui, A. O., McDonald-Mosley, R., & Burke, A. E. (2010) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxq012 · Cited by 434
Disparities in family planning
Dehlendorf, C., Rodriguez, M. I., Levy, K., Borrero, S., & Steinauer, J. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022 · Cited by 414
Sitruk-Ware, R., & Nath, A. (2013) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2012.09.004 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Frost, J. J., & Darroch, J. E.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- Guttmacher Institute
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 94-104
- ISSN
- 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-2393
- OpenAlex
- W1980606130
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors Associated with Contraceptive Choice and Inconsistent Method Use, United States, 2004. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1363/4009408
- The paper
- Frost, J. J., & Darroch, J. E. (2008). Factors Associated with Contraceptive Choice and Inconsistent Method Use, United States, 2004. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1363/4009408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.