Cited by 48Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Changes in Sexual Risk Behavior as Young Men Transition to Adulthood

Open access
Dariotis, Jacinda K., Sonenstein, Freya L., Gates, Gary J., Capps, Randy, Astone, Nan M., Pleck, Joseph H., Sifakis, Frangiscos, Zeger, Scott·2008·Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Abstract

CONTEXT: Understanding how young men's sexual risk behaviors change during the transition from adolescence to early adulthood is important for the design and evaluation of effective strategies to reduce the transmission of HIV and other STDs. METHODS: Data from three waves of the National Survey of Adolescent Males (1988, 1991 and 1995) were used to categorize 1,880 respondents into clusters according to sexual risk behaviors. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted to assess associations between clusters and rates of self-reported STD diagnoses and positive chlamydia tests. RESULTS: Two dimensions of sexual risk-taking defined the clusters: partner characteristics and condom use. More than 50% of men remained in low-risk groups over time. In the first two waves, 24-32% of men reported engaging in high-risk behaviors (risky partners, condom nonuse); these behaviors were associated with elevated levels of STD outcomes. Nearly 40% of men who entered a high-risk group in the first two waves transitioned to a lower risk group by the third wave. Nine percent of men either engaged in increasingly risky behaviors or maintained membership in high-risk groups; elevated STD rates characterized both trajectories. Low condom use combined with having multiple partners during adolescence was associated with elevated STD rates in the year preceding the third wave; high condom use coupled with having risky partners was not. CONCLUSIONS: The prominence of low-risk behaviors over time suggests that most young men avoid sexual risk-taking. Effective strategies to reduce HIV and STD risk in young men must simultaneously address multiple dimensions of sexual behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1363/4021808

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antisocial behavior, risky sex, and substance use were behavior-based measures often measured by indicating presence or frequency of the behavior.

    “The last three constructs were behavior-based measures and often measured by indicating the presence or frequency of the behavior [132,133].”

    From Parentification Vulnerability, Reactivity, Resilience, and Thriving: A Mixed Methods Systematic Literature Review (2023) · cites this paper as [132]

    The Measures section describes risky-sex measures based on counts of partners and months of concurrency, plus the proportion of unprotected sex acts. It does not describe measures of antisocial behavior or substance use, so it supports only the risky-sex part of the attributed claim. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and dependent areas, 2005, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, Vol. 17, rev. ed., Atlanta: U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services and CDC, 2007.
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Workshop Summary: Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention, Bethesda, MD: NIAID, 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dariotis, J. K., Sonenstein, F. L., Gates, G. J., Capps, R., Astone, N. M., Pleck, J. H., Sifakis, F., & Zeger, S.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Dariotis, Jacinda K.
Venue
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Published
2008-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
218-225
ISSN
  • 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-2393
OpenAlex
W1997397457
Cited by
48
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD036948)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
sexual risk behavior, young men, coming of age, adolescent boys, chlamydia, condom use, multiple sexual partners, HIV prevention, risk trajectories
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Chlamydia, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, United States, Cluster Analysis, Condoms, Adolescent Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review