The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2011
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Following a long‐term decline, abortion incidence stabilized between 2005 and 2008. Given the proliferation of state‐level abortion restrictions, it is critical to assess abortion incidence and access to services since that time. METHODS: In 2012–2013, all facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2010 and 2011 were surveyed. Data on the number of abortions were combined with population data to estimate national and state‐level abortion rates. Incidence of abortions was assessed by provider type and caseload. Information on state abortion regulations implemented between 2008 and 2011 was collected, and possible relationships with abortion rates and provider numbers were considered. RESULTS: In 2011, an estimated 1.1 million abortions were performed in the United States; the abortion rate was 16.9 per 1,000 women aged 15–44, representing a drop of 13% since 2008. The number of abortion providers declined 4%; the number of clinics dropped 1%. In 2011, 89% of counties had no clinics, and 38% of women of reproductive age lived in those counties. Early medication abortions accounted for a greater proportion of nonhospital abortions in 2011 (23%) than in 2008 (17%). Of the 106 new abortion restrictions implemented during the study period, few or none appeared to be related to state‐level patterns in abortion rates or number of providers. CONCLUSIONS: The national abortion rate has resumed its decline, and no evidence was found that the overall drop in abortion incidence was related to the decrease in providers or to restrictions implemented between 2008 and 2011.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World
Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00411.x · Cited by 863
Cited by
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1506575 · Cited by 1,989
Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Recent Trends
Sedgh, G., Finer, L. B., Bankole, A., Eilers, M. A., & Singh, S. (2015) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007 · Cited by 812
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014
Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2017) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/psrh.12015 · Cited by 455
Self-citationAbortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access
Singh, S., Remez, L., Sedgh, G., Kwok, L., & Onda, T. (2018) · doi:10.1363/2018.29199 · Cited by 432
Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (< 14 weeks' gestation)
Allen, R. H., & Goldberg, A. B. (2016) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.001 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J.
- Venue
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Publisher
- Guttmacher Institute
- Published
- 2014-02-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1538-6341 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-2393
- OpenAlex
- W2065938147
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 49.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1363/46e0414
- The paper
- Jones, R. K., & Jerman, J. (2014). Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2011. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e0414
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.