The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2 Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimization
Abstract
In earlier studies of passive remote sensing of shallow-water bathymetry, bottom depths were usually derived by empirical regression. This approach provides rapid data processing, but it requires knowledge of a few true depths for the regression parameters to be determined, and it cannot reveal in-water constituents. In this study a newly developed hyperspectral, remote-sensing reflectance model for shallow water is applied to data from computer simulations and field measurements. In the process, a remote-sensing reflectance spectrum is modeled by a set of values of absorption, backscattering, bottom albedo, and bottom depth; then it is compared with the spectrum from measurements. The difference between the two spectral curves is minimized by adjusting the model values in a predictor-corrector scheme. No information in addition to the measured reflectance is required. When the difference reaches a minimum, or the set of variables is optimized, absorption coefficients and bottom depths along with other properties are derived simultaneously. For computer-simulated data at a wind speed of 5 m/s the retrieval error was 5.3% for depths ranging from 2.0 to 20.0 m and 7.0% for total absorption coefficients at 440 nm ranging from 0.04 to 0.24 m(-1). At a wind speed of 10 m/s the errors were 5.1% for depth and 6.3% for total absorption at 440 nm. For field data with depths ranging from 0.8 to 25.0 m the difference was 10.9% (R2 = 0.96, N = 37) between inversion-derived and field-measured depth values and just 8.1% (N = 33) for depths greater than 2.0 m. These results suggest that the model and the method used in this study, which do not require in situ calibration measurements, perform very well in retrieving in-water optical properties and bottom depths from above-surface hyperspectral measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques
Gholizadeh, M., Melesse, A., & Reddi, L. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16081298 · Cited by 1,122
A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products
Bailey, S. W., & Werdell, P. J. (2006) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.015 · Cited by 964
Kay, S., Hedley, J. D., & Lavender, S. (2009) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs1040697 · Cited by 441
Satellite-derived bathymetry using the ICESat-2 lidar and Sentinel-2 imagery datasets
Ma, Y., Xu, N., Liu, Z., Yang, B., Yang, F., Wang, X. H., & Li, S. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.112047 · Cited by 394
Cannizzaro, J. P., Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Heil, C. A., & Vargo, G. A. (2008) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/j.csr.2004.04.007 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, Z., Carder, K. L., Mobley, C. D., Steward, R. G., & Patch, J. S.
- Venue
- Applied Optics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1999-06-20
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3831
- ISSN
- 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4522
- OpenAlex
- W2169939759
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2 Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.38.003831
- The paper
- Lee, Z., Carder, K. L., Mobley, C. D., Steward, R. G., & Patch, J. S. (1999). Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2 Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimization. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.38.003831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.