The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communicating with waves between volumes: evaluating orthogonal spatial channels and limits on coupling strengths
Abstract
A rigorous method for finding the best-connected orthogonal communication channels, modes, or degrees of freedom for scalar waves between two volumes of arbitrary shape and position is derived explicitly without assuming planar surfaces or paraxial approximations. The communication channels are the solutions of two eigenvalue problems and are identical to the cavity modes of a double phase-conjugate resonator. A sum rule for the connection strengths is also derived, the sum being a simple volume integral. These results are used to analyze rectangular prism volumes, small volumes, thin volumes in different relative orientations, and arbitrary near-field volumes: all situations in which previous planar approaches have failed for one or more reasons. Previous planar results are reproduced explicitly, extending them to finite depth. Depth is shown not to increase the number of communications modes unless the volumes are close when compared with their depths. How to estimate the connection strengths in some cases without a full solution of the eigenvalue problem is discussed so that estimates of the number of usable communications modes can be made from the sum rule. In general, the approach gives a rigorous basis for handling problems related to volume sources and receivers. It may be especially applicable in near-field problems and in situations in which volume is an intrinsic part of the problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prolate Spheroidal Wave Functions, Fourier Analysis and Uncertainty - I
Slepian, D., & Pollak, H. O. (1961) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1961.tb03976.x · Cited by 2,492
Cited by
Self-configuring universal linear optical component [Invited]
Miller, D. A. B. (2013) · Photonics Research · doi:10.1364/prj.1.000001 · Cited by 474
Self-citationNear-Field Beamforming for Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces-Assisted MIMO Networks
Papazafeiropoulos, A., Kourtessis, P., Chatzinotas, S., Kaklamani, D. I., & Venieris, I. S. (2024) · IEEE Wireless Communications Letters · doi:10.1109/lwc.2024.3438840 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D. A. B.
- Venue
- Applied Optics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2000-04-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1681
- ISSN
- 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4522
- OpenAlex
- W2114814651
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communicating with waves between volumes: evaluating orthogonal spatial channels and limits on coupling strengths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.39.001681
- The paper
- Miller, D. A. B. (2000). Communicating with waves between volumes: evaluating orthogonal spatial channels and limits on coupling strengths. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.39.001681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.