The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Atmospheric correction of satellite ocean color imagery: the black pixel assumption
Abstract
The assumption that values of water-leaving radiance in the near-infrared (NIR) are negligible enable aerosol radiative properties to be easily determined in the correction of satellite ocean color imagery. This is referred to as the black pixel assumption. We examine the implications of the black pixel assumption using a simple bio-optical model for the NIR water-leaving reflectance [rho(w)(lambda(NIR))](N). In productive waters [chlorophyll (Chl) concentration >2 mg m(-3)], estimates of [rho(w)(lambda(NIR))](N) are several orders of magnitude larger than those expected for pure seawater. These large values of [rho(w)(lambda(NIR))](N) result in an overcorrection of atmospheric effects for retrievals of water-leaving reflectance that are most pronounced in the violet and blue spectral region. The overcorrection increases dramatically with Chl, reducing the true water-leaving radiance by roughly 75% when Chl is equal to 5 mg m(-3). Relaxing the black pixel assumption in the correction of Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) satellite ocean color imagery provides significant improvements in Chl and water-leaving reflectance retrievals when Chl values are greater than 2 mg m(-3). Improvements in the present modeling of [rho(w)(lambda(NIR))](N) are considered, particularly for turbid coastal waters. However, this research shows that the effects of nonzero NIR reflectance must be included in the correction of satellite ocean color imagery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing
Emberton, S., Chittka, L., Cavallaro, A., & Wang, M. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8010001 · Cited by 486
Self-citationKay, S., Hedley, J. D., & Lavender, S. (2009) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs1040697 · Cited by 441
Monitoring turbidity in Tampa Bay using MODIS/Aqua 250-m imagery
Chen, Z., Hu, C., & Muller-Karger, F. (2007) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.019 · Cited by 320
Cannizzaro, J. P., Carder, K. L., Chen, F. R., Heil, C. A., & Vargo, G. A. (2008) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/j.csr.2004.04.007 · Cited by 170
Amin, R., Zhou, J., Gilerson, A., Gross, B., Moshary, F., & Ahmed, S. (2009) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.17.009126 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegel, D. A., Wang, M., Maritorena, S., & Robinson, W.
- Venue
- Applied Optics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2000-07-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3582
- ISSN
- 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4522
- OpenAlex
- W2083443605
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric correction of satellite ocean color imagery: the black pixel assumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/ao.39.003582
- The paper
- Siegel, D. A., Wang, M., Maritorena, S., & Robinson, W. (2000). Atmospheric correction of satellite ocean color imagery: the black pixel assumption. Applied Optics. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.39.003582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.