Cited by 40Laser Material Processing TechniquesLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Laser-ablated volume and depth as a function of pulse duration in aluminum targets

Abstract

The ablated depth and volume per laser pulse from an aluminum target were measured for pulse durations that ranged from 80 fs to 270 ps at an average fluence of approximately 100 J/cm2 and a wavelength of 0.8 microm. The ablated volume showed a flat maximum for subpicosecond pulses and a minimum for approximately 6 ps. The crater diameters were rather constant up to pulse durations of approximately 6 ps and increased for larger pulse durations. As a result, the ablated depth also showed a plateau for subpicosecond pulses but decreased monotonically with pulse duration. A physical interpretation of these results and their consequences for laser applications are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ao.44.000278

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Winefordner, 2000, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 15, 1161, 10.1039/a910219l · DOI
  2. Momma, 1997, Appl. Surf. Sci., 110, 15, 10.1016/S0169-4332(96)00613-7 · DOI
  3. Sallé, 1999, Appl. Phys. A, 69, S381, 10.1007/s003390051421 · DOI
  4. Laville, 2002, Phys. Rev. E Part 2, 66, 066415, 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.066415 · DOI
  5. Momma, 1996, Opt. Commun., 129, 134, 10.1016/0030-4018(96)00250-7 · DOI
  6. Sletten, 1999, Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers, 30, 742, 10.3928/1542-8877-19991101-10 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Le Drogoff, B., Vidal, F., Laville, S., Chaker, M., Johnston, T., Barthélemy, O., Margot, J., & Sabsabi, M.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Vidal, François
  • Laville, Stéphane
  • Chaker, Mohamed
  • Johnston, Tudor
Venue
Applied Optics
Published
2005-01-10
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
278
ISSN
  • 0003-6935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4522
OpenAlex
W2117347628
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Optics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Laser Material Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Keywords
laser ablation, ablation depth, ablation volume, pulse duration, aluminum target, sub-picosecond pulses, picosecond pulses, femtosecond pulses, crater diameter, laser-matter interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review