The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fabrication of microscale medical devices by two-photon polymerization with multiple foci via a spatial light modulator
Open accessAbstract
Two-photon polymerization is an appealing technique for producing microscale devices due to its flexibility in producing structures with a wide range of geometries as well as its compatibility with materials suitable for biomedical applications. The greatest limiting factor in widespread use of two-photon polymerization is the slow fabrication times associated with line-by-line, high-resolution structuring. In this study, a recently developed technology was used to produce microstructures by two-photon polymerization with multiple foci, which significantly reduces the production time. Computer generated hologram pattern technology was used to generate multiple laser beams in controlled positions from a single laser. These multiple beams were then used to simultaneously produce multiple microstructures by two-photon polymerization. Arrays of micro-Venus structures, tissue engineering scaffolds, and microneedle arrays were produced by multifocus two-photon polymerization. To our knowledge, this work is the first demonstration of multifocus two-photon polymerization technology for production of a functional medical device. Multibeam fabrication has the potential to greatly improve the efficiency of two-photon polymerization production of microscale devices such as tissue engineering scaffolds and microneedle arrays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ovsianikov, A., Malinauskas, M., Schlie, S., Chichkov, B., Gittard, S., Narayan, R., Löbler, M., Sternberg, K., Schmitz, K.-P., & Haverich, A. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.023 · Cited by 234
Self-citationThree-Dimensional Biodegradable Structures Fabricated by Two-Photon Polymerization
Claeyssens, F., Hasan, E. A., Gaidukeviciute, A., Achilleos, D. S., Ranella, A., Reinhardt, C., Ovsianikov, A., Shizhou, X., Fotakis, C., Vamvakaki, M., et al. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la803803m · Cited by 187
Self-citation
Cited by
Emerging Technologies of Flexible Pressure Sensors: Materials, Modeling, Devices, and Manufacturing
Huang, Y., Fan, X., Chen, S., & Zhao, N. (2019) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201808509 · Cited by 543
Ultrafast Laser Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Saunders, J., Elbestawi, M., & Fang, Q. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp7030089 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Gittard, S. D., Nguyen, A., Obata, K., Koroleva, A., Narayan, R. J., & Chichkov, B. N.
- Venue
- Biomedical Optics Express
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2011-10-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3167
- ISSN
- 2156-7085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166758256
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.