The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationship between Critical Flicker-Frequency and a Set of Low-Frequency Characteristics of the Eye
Abstract
The results of measurements of the critical flicker frequency of the eye depending on both the average luminance of the test field and the time function of this luminance were recorded by plotting the “ripple ratio” r versus the critical frequency; r is defined as amplitude of first Fourier component/average luminance of the stimulus. It is shown that with constant average luminance the points observed for various time functions fit into one smooth curve which for low luminances is monotonous.At high luminances the curve shows a minimum for r, which is smaller than the threshold value of the foveal brightness discrimination ratio 1.35 percent, observed for a frequency f = 1 c/s.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parise, C. V., & Spence, C. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005664 · Cited by 272
Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning
Donner, K. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.222679 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- de Lange Dzn, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1954-05-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 380
- ISSN
- 0030-3941 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019496637
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between Critical Flicker-Frequency and a Set of Low-Frequency Characteristics of the Eye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josa.44.000380
- The paper
- de Lange Dzn, H. (1954). Relationship between Critical Flicker-Frequency and a Set of Low-Frequency Characteristics of the Eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1364/josa.44.000380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
