The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells
Abstract
If striate cells had the receptive-field (RF) shapes classically attributed to them, their preferred spatial frequencies would vary considerably with orientation. Other models of RF shape would predict a greater independence between orientation and spatial-frequency tuning. We have examined this by recording the responses of cat striate-cortex cells to a wide range of different spatial-frequency and orientation combinations. In almost all cells studied, peak orientation did not consistently vary with spatial frequency, but the majority of cells showed some change in peak spatial-frequency tuning with orientation. The amount of change in peak spatial frequency tended to be greater for cells that were narrowly tuned for orientation. However, cells narrowly (and also very broadly) tuned for spatial frequency tended to show considerable independence of spatial-frequency and orientation tuning, and in all but a few cells the degree of change was less than predicted by the classic RF model. Such cells were found to fire only to patterns whose local spatial spectra fell within a compact, restricted, roughly circular two-dimensional spatial-frequency region. We conclude that the two-dimensional RF shape of striate cells more closely approximates that predicted by a two-dimensional Gabor model or by a Gaussian-derivative model than it does the classic shape based on the output of geniculate cells with aligned RF's.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Schiller, P. H., Finlay, B. L., & Volman, S. F. (1976) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1288 · Cited by 458
Cited by
Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells
Field, D. J. (1987) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.4.002379 · Cited by 3,241
Image representation using 2D Gabor wavelets
Lee, T. S. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.541406 · Cited by 1,629
Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters
Bovik, A. C., Clark, M., & Geisler, W. S. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.41384 · Cited by 1,382
Neural Mechanisms of Orientation Selectivity in the Visual Cortex
Ferster, D., & Miller, K. D. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.441 · Cited by 678
Computational Neuroscience of Vision
Rolls, E., & Deco, G. (2001) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524885.001.0001 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, M. A., & De Valois, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1985-07-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1124
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2119978181
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.2.001124
- The paper
- Webster, M. A., & De Valois, R. L. (1985). Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.2.001124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.