Cited by 890Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Open access
Movshon, J A, Thompson, I D, Tolhurst, D J·1978·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. We have examined the responses of simple cells in the cat's atriate cortex to visual patterns that were designed to reveal the extent to which these cells may be considered to sum light-evoked influences linearly across their receptive fields. We used one-dimensional luminance-modulated bars and grating as stimuli; their orientation was always the same as the preferred orientation of the neurone under study. The stimuli were presented on an oscilloscope screen by a digital computer, which also accumulated neuronal responses and controlled a randomized sequence of stimulus presentations. 2. The majority of simple cells respond to sinusoidal gratings that are moving or whose contrast is modulated in time in a manner consistent with the hypothesis that they have linear spatial summation. Their responses to moving gratings of all spatial frequencies are modulated in synchrony with the passage of the gratings' bars across their receptive fields, and they do not produce unmodulated responses even at the highest spatial frequencies. Many of these cells respond to temporally modulated stationary gratings simply by changing their response amplitude sinusoidally as the spatial phase of the grating the grating is varied. Nonetheless, their behavior appears to indicate linear spatial summation, since we show in an Appendix that the absence of a 'null' phase in a visual neurone need not indicate non-linear spatial summation, and further that a linear neurone lacking a 'null' phase should give responses of the form that we have observed in this type of simple cell. 3. A minority of simple cells appears to have significant non-linearities of spatial summation. These neurones respond to moving gratings of high spatial frequency with a partially or totally unmodulated elevation of firing rate. They have no 'null' phases when tested with stationary gratings, and reveal their non-linearity by giving responses to gratings of some spatial phases that are composed partly or wholly of even harmonics of the stimulus frequency ('on-off' responses). 4. We compared simple receptive fields with their sensitivity to sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequencies. Qualitatively, the most sensitive subregions of simple cells' receptive fields are roughly the same width as the individual bars of the gratings to which they are most sensitive. Quantitatively, their receptive field profiles measured with thin stationary lines, agree well with predicted profiles derived by Fourier synthesis of their spatial frequency tuning curves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neurons in the visual cortex and extra-striate cortex are spatial frequency and orientation selective, and simple cells in the visual cortex act more or less as linear filters.

    “Neurons in the visual cortex and the extra-striate cortex are spatial frequency and orientation selective and simple cells in the visual cortex are known to act more or less as linear filters [51], [52], [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-10
Volume
283
Issue
1
Pages
53-77
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2022491393
Cited by
890
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
simple cells, primary visual cortex, spatial summation, receptive fields, linear summation, sinusoidal gratings, moving gratings, spatial frequency tuning, phase sensitivity, cat visual system, ON and OFF responses, even harmonics
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Cats, Motion Perception, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review