The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes
Abstract
We took panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes at regular intervals in two- or three-dimensional grids covering 1 m2 or 1 m3 and determined how the root mean square pixel differences between each of the images and a reference image acquired at one of the locations in the grid develop over distance from the reference position. We then asked whether the reference position can be pinpointed from a random starting position by moving the panoramic imaging device in such a way that the image differences relative to the reference image are minimized. We find that on time scales of minutes to hours, outdoor locations are accurately defined by a clear, sharp minimum in a smooth three-dimensional (3D) volume of image differences (the 3D difference function). 3D difference functions depend on the spatial-frequency content of natural scenes and on the spatial layout of objects therein. They become steeper in the vicinity of dominant objects. Their shape and smoothness, however, are affected by changes in illumination and shadows. The difference functions generated by rotation are similar in shape to those generated by translation, but their plateau values are higher. Rotational difference functions change little with distance from the reference location. Simple gradient descent methods are surprisingly successful in recovering a goal location, even if faced with transient changes in illumination. Our results show that view-based homing with panoramic images is in principle feasible in natural environments and does not require the identification of individual landmarks. We discuss the relevance of our findings to the study of robot and insect homing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Landmark learning in bees: Experiments and models
Cartwright, B. A., & Collett, T. S. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Physiology ? A · doi:10.1007/bf00605469 · Cited by 756
Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information
van der Schaaf, A., & van Hateren, J. H. (1996) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(96)00002-8 · Cited by 528
A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation
Lambrinos, D., Möller, R., Labhart, T., Pfeifer, R., & Wehner, R. (2000) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(99)00064-0 · Cited by 519
Origins of scaling in natural images
Ruderman, D. L. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00008-4 · Cited by 355
Franz, M. O., & Mallot, H. A. (2000) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(99)00069-x · Cited by 314
Visual spatial memory in desert ants,Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Wehner, R., & Räber, F. (1979) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01953197 · Cited by 259
The distribution of oriented contours in the real world
Coppola, D. M., Purves, H. R., McCoy, A. N., & Purves, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.7.4002 · Cited by 238
Cartwright, B. A., & Collett, T. S. (1987) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00318718 · Cited by 237
Pattern recognition in bees: orientation discrimination
Hateren, V. J., Srinivasan, M. V., & Wait, P. B. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00192658 · Cited by 237
Reflective surfaces for panoramic imaging
Chahl, J., & Srinivasan, M. V. (1997) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.36.008275 · Cited by 227
Self-citation
Cited by
The insect central complex and the neural basis of navigational strategies
Honkanen, A., Adden, A., da Silva Freitas, J., & Heinze, S. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.188854 · Cited by 238
Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants,Myrmecia croslandi
Narendra, A., Gourmaud, S., & Zeil, J. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0683 · Cited by 137
Self-citationOptimal multiguidance integration in insect navigation
Hoinville, T., & Wehner, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1721668115 · Cited by 116
A decentralised neural model explaining optimal integration of navigational strategies in insects
Sun, X., Yue, S., & Mangan, M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54026 · Cited by 96
A Snapshot-Based Mechanism for Celestial Orientation
el Jundi, B., Foster, J. J., Khaldy, L., Byrne, M. J., Dacke, M., & Baird, E. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.030 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeil, J., Hofmann, M. I., & Chahl, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 450
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W1986210471
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.20.000450
- The paper
- Zeil, J., Hofmann, M. I., & Chahl, J. S. (2003). Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.20.000450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.