The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices
Abstract
Finding the relationship between two coordinate systems by using pairs of measurements of the coordinates of a number of points in both systems is a classic photogrammetric task. The solution has applications in stereophotogrammetry and in robotics. We present here a closed-form solution to the least-squares problem for three or more points. Currently, various empirical, graphical, and numerical iterative methods are in use. Derivation of a closed-form solution can be simplified by using unit quaternions to represent rotation, as was shown in an earlier paper [ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A4, 629 ( 1987)]. Since orthonormal matrices are used more widely to represent rotation, we now present a solution in which 3 × 3 matrices are used. Our method requires the computation of the square root of a symmetric matrix. We compare the new result with that obtained by an alternative method in which orthonormality is not directly enforced. In this other method a best-fit linear transformation is found, and then the nearest orthonormal matrix is chosen for the rotation. We note that the best translational offset is the difference between the centroid of the coordinates in one system and the rotated and scaled centroid of the coordinates in the other system. The best scale is equal to the ratio of the root-mean-square deviations of the coordinates in the two systems from their respective centroids. These exact results are to be preferred to approximate methods based on measurements of a few selected points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm
Rusinkiewicz, S., & Levoy, M. (2002) · Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling · doi:10.1109/im.2001.924423 · Cited by 3,945
EPnP: An Accurate O(n) Solution to the PnP Problem
Lepetit, V., Moreno-Noguer, F., & Fua, P. (2009) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-008-0152-6 · Cited by 3,298
Estimating 3-D rigid body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms
Eggert, D. W., Lorusso, A., & Fisher, R. B. (1997) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s001380050048 · Cited by 804
Least squares 3D surface and curve matching
Gruen, A., & Akca, D. (2005) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.006 · Cited by 536
Monocular model-based 3D tracking of rigid objects: a survey
Lepetit, V., & Fua, P. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000001 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, B. K. P., Hilden, H. M., & Negahdaripour, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 1988-07-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1127
- ISSN
- 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-8532
- OpenAlex
- W2094694151
- Cited by
- 1,151
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/josaa.5.001127
- The paper
- Horn, B. K. P., Hilden, H. M., & Negahdaripour, S. (1988). Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.5.001127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.